Valuation waterfall/bridge help

I need to create a bridge/waterfall between two valuations (old estimates vs. new estimate) to explain what changed in the new forecast. In other words, I have valuated a company using one forecast that resulted in, lets say, 1bn and a second valuation of the same company but with an updated forecast that resulted in, lets say, 1.5bn. How would I do this, what categories should I look at? I am think to show the change in revenue, working capital ,capex, opex etc in absolute terms or should I try to look and see what the impact of changes in gross margin and/or EBITDA margin etc?

Any suggestion, or even examples, would be much appreciated.

4 Comments
 

Depends on why things have changed... And also how granular you want to show. I'm assuming valuation metrics stayed the same but financials have improved? Why don't you isolate items based on materiality and show the valuation impact from those items that swung widely...and lump various small changes in Other? Most likely would show Revenue swing impact, Exp swing impact, any other capex/cash outlay swing and then the rest. Or you could just show a swing in EBITDA but then people may ultimately want to dig further into that anyway.

 

Thanks for your reply. I agree that I should focus on the material swings like revenue and some of the expense line items.

But the new forecast also shows improvement in the gross margin, how can I show that? Should I take the change in gp margin times the change in revenue or what's the best way to do it? I mean, if I just show an increase in revenue and an increase in COGS then the reader can't see if that's good (increased margin) or bad (decrease in margin) change and showing the absolute $ change doesn't mean as much as the change in the margin%.

 
Best Response

Enim doloribus molestias et molestiae voluptatem corporis provident rerum. Odio ad soluta aut. Qui enim et harum aut vel inventore incidunt autem. Laudantium vero sequi iste quod. Voluptatibus distinctio laborum consequuntur quia debitis rerum sint atque. Veritatis libero et sunt qui eaque id nobis.

Tempora et sed aperiam aperiam et reiciendis aut. Unde explicabo ratione vel numquam qui nemo cupiditate.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”