I'm studying up questions in preparing for this coming recruiting season. One question that I had was why do multiples used forecasts instead of historical #s? I read somewhere that it's more reliable but how exactly? Thanks!
| +208 | UBS Accused of Favoring H-1B Workers While Cutting U.S.-Born Employees | 51 | 4h |
| +108 | IB Energy Drink Tier List / Ranking | 72 | 13h |
| +94 | ONLY THESE BANKS OR YOU STRUCK OUT | 30 | 2h |
| +91 | PJT M&A Group Selection 2026 | 14 | 9h |
| +46 | Firm Thinks I'm Lying About Offer | 18 | 1h |
| +40 | Feedback for internship first desk at IBD BB - personal fit, "don't be too confident" | 29 | 11h |
| +31 | Stay at Weak Dealflow Team or Lateral? | 7 | 13h |
| +29 | Does BofA still pay its associates rat pellets? | 15 | 10h |
| +22 | Indiana University Fraternity Pipelines | 13 | 9h |
| +20 | Choosing a group - Investment Banking | 5 | 9h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
1) Forecasted #s don't include any one-time charges that would distort the underlying business (or profitability thereof)
2) When you buy a business, either as a minority (public equities) or control (PE, etc.), you're interested in valuing the future cash flows / prospects of the business, not the past - using forecasted #s enables you to capture some of the growth of the future
Ahh #2 makes a lot of sense. As far as #1, would you not adjust your EBITDA figure to strip out one off transactions?
For these companies, won't forecast #s be inaccurate since they probably wouldn't sustain that level of growth beyond a X number of years? Or would this be an instance where you rely more on comparable comps and precedent transactions?
Sorry for all the questions. Conceptually I'm starting to understand valuations (didn't take finance in college), but the application of it is still a bit hazy.
along similar lines to point #2 above: particularly with high growth companies (ie many in the tech sector), the companies are being sold at a stage in their development such that their last 5 years look absolutely nothing like their next 5 years. the value of these companies lies in their rapidly accelerating growth. therefore, using historical numbers would dramatically undervalue the company.
now the trick is convincing buyers that your projections aren't a load of crap...
Double post....
Well I was being a bit tongue-in-cheek with my last sentence; in general, buyers will believe your future growth projections if you're able to tell a compelling story (granted they'll probably discount them a bit).
LOL! No I got you were saying with the last sentence, and it does makes sense your valuation is as reliable as how well you can convince a buyer. I just meant conceptually, isn't forward multiples just as unreliable as backwards multiples for high growth companies?
Veniam et consequatur dolores. Esse nihil sed dignissimos aliquam aliquid id iusto. Perspiciatis aliquid inventore rerum dignissimos quo suscipit. Doloremque aut ea sit perspiciatis et tenetur. Voluptas dolorem aut animi qui saepe non.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...