Value of deal experience on smaller M&A transactions ($50m - $100m EV)

Looking to get a gauge on how valuable people think deal experience is on smaller transactions done at a boutique IB shop. Mostly with regards to making the move to PE or a larger MM / BB IB. Non-US, Non-EU region so these deals probably carry slightly more weight here but happy to get perspectives from anyone anywhere.

Focus on at the Analyst / Associate level, with end-to-end responsibilities (Model, IM, comps, buyer lists, DD/VDR management, etc). If someone is working on 4-5 deals per year and 3-4 are completed, would 2-3 years of this level of deal experience be considered valuable enough to make a shift to BB / MM IB or MM PE? Or a shift into an IB role in a  larger non-US market (London, etc.)

Also would this level of experience have any chance of competing with someone that has done 1-2 $1b+ deals at a larger bank, or is value much more important than volume?

6 Comments
 

When it comes to deal experience on smaller M&A transactions ($50m - $100m EV) at a boutique IB shop, here's what you need to know:

  1. Value of Smaller Deal Experience:

    • Smaller deal experience can be valuable, especially if you have end-to-end responsibilities like modeling, creating IMs, comps, buyer lists, and managing DD/VDR. This hands-on exposure is often more comprehensive than what analysts at larger banks might get, where roles can be more segmented.
    • Completing 3-4 deals per year over 2-3 years demonstrates strong execution skills and deal flow, which can be appealing to MM PE or larger MM/BB IB recruiters.
  2. Transition to Larger Markets or Firms:

    • Moving to a larger MM/BB IB or MM PE is possible, but the transition depends on how well you can articulate your experience and its relevance. Highlighting your technical skills, deal volume, and ability to manage multiple processes will be key.
    • For non-US, non-EU regions, smaller deals may carry more weight due to market dynamics, but transitioning to a larger market like London will likely require networking and demonstrating how your experience translates to larger, more complex transactions.
  3. Competing with Larger Deal Experience:

    • While volume is valuable, larger deals ($1b+) at BBs or EBs often carry more prestige due to the complexity and brand recognition. However, the skills you gain from smaller deals—like managing processes end-to-end—can sometimes outweigh the prestige factor, especially for MM PE or smaller MM IB roles.
    • For BB/EB roles, the prestige and complexity of larger deals might still give those candidates an edge, but your broader responsibilities and deal volume can make you competitive for certain positions.
  4. Key Differentiators:

    • The ability to demonstrate strong technical skills, leadership in deal processes, and adaptability to different deal sizes will be critical.
    • Networking and storytelling will play a significant role in bridging the gap between your boutique experience and the expectations of larger firms.

In summary, while smaller deal experience may not carry the same prestige as larger transactions, the hands-on exposure and volume can still be highly valuable, particularly for MM PE or MM IB roles. Transitioning to BB/EB or larger markets like London is possible but will require strategic positioning of your experience.

Sources: If smaller banks say they offer juniors more deal exposure, why are bulge bracket positions still more highly regarded?, Why do MM IB shops get trashed on so much?, Q&A: Non Targ -> BB Coverage Group -> Incoming MM PE, "Walk me through a recent deal" sample, newsletter alert, Is CRE Debt Experience Pretty Enough for PE?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Very comparable skillset whether it is $100M or $1B. At least as a junior the $1B is probably sponsor owned and they have a bunch of materials, model, etc. that can be updated rather than starting from scratch like a $100M founder-owned business.

Definitely can parlay that into MM IB or even EB IB with some effort (that's what I did). PE tends to be more structured and rigid with where they recruit from so you need to make move to MM or EB/BB to have a shot even if technically skillset could be useful for MM / LMM shops.

As a side rant - I've had way better experiences with laterals from MM IB shops than from BB IB. The BB model for most banks is so whack. Likely literally the coverage team will work on the CIP and understand the ins and outs of the company, the M&A team will do the model. But when it comes time to do the diligence (which are generally very company / industry specific questions), the industry team like vanishes. Like literally was on a co-advisor deal recently and never saw the associate / VP on a call after MPs again, it was crazy (and this was a 'good' bank, MS). Robot M&A team just passes questions back and forth to mgmt. with no effort. I'm biased but the boutique advisory model is so much better for clients, I can't believe BB's still get away with how they run processes.

 

Appreciate the response, this does align with what I was thinking / hoping. Side note, I made this post because I’ve got a potential job offer at aforementioned small M&A shop. Trying to make the call as to whether so jump there after only being in my current corp dev role for ~3 months.

Always wanted to do IB but couldn’t find a role before moving overseas, which I’ve also just done 3 months ago. Any thoughts on this move? I would be taking on probably at least 20 more hours of work a week for similar pay (in Y1 at least).

Struggling to make the call as I’m enjoying the cushy corporate life but there’s a lot of non-deal work and I could see myself getting bored of it.

Prior work experience is Big 4 non-M&A deal team (FDD/CDD).

 

Rerum necessitatibus impedit et animi est. Quis soluta architecto iure sit. Iste autem qui sunt sint rerum quaerat natus. Soluta molestias illum id et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (45) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”