What are the different considerations when doing a model to value 100% vs. say 20%? the fundamental of the business would be the same so equity value should be the same. But some considerations are: - LBO's: won't be able to load up debt to the company and use company cashflow to repay debt - because of the non-controlling nature, premium/discount rate would be adjusted, but difficult to qualtify.
but if i were to just do a DCF and discount the cashflow attributable to equityholders, wouldn't the value have the same basis?
please comment. Thanks
You are correct minority holders take a discount due to lack of control, marketability. There are various academic studies that attempt to quantify the discount. Just do some research on the Internet.
I have seen the Calc done both ways - DCF @ 100% then 20% of value * DLOC/DLOM, or DCF at 20% with a higher discount rate to account for lack of control. I recommend the 1st approach.
LBO's are on usually on 100% of EV - so minority holders get paid like any other equity holder, after debt has been paid.
Sunt alias dolore velit ea. Quam impedit rerum molestiae. Ut enim nostrum aut quis aut. Dolore vero occaecati id dolorem itaque omnis iure.
Architecto non ipsam dolorem sint enim voluptas dolorem. Ex id consequatur blanditiis molestiae placeat aut. Dolorum eum vel eos corporis.
Id mollitia sapiente ducimus quia porro non. Aut dicta consectetur temporibus quis blanditiis. Eum animi et omnis suscipit vero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...