WACC - Risk Free

What would you guys use right now as a risk free rate? The 10 year bond yield seems to be insanely low, would you use this sub 1% rate? Or go with a past one like 3%. My intuition is you have to go with the very low 1% rate because that is your current alternative for a risk free asset.

6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Whenever you're calculating something like WACC, you need to step back and see if both the assumptions and results make sense.

Let's say that we use your 1% risk free assumption, What's your market risk premium? What's your beta? If you haven't changed those from the pre-pandemic period (when the risk free rates were higher), then you're saying that it's easier to raise capital right now because the hurdle rate is lower. That obviously doesn't make a lot of sense, so clearly you'd have to adjust both the MRP and beta (both of which should theoretically be higher and should more than offset the lower risk free rate). The problem that you're going to run into is trying to calibrate beta and MRP to 3 months of data (so that your rf, MRP, and beta are on an apples to apples basis i.e. post-pandemic).

That's a long winded way of saying that I'd just use the pre-pandemic assumptions with maybe some kind of premium to reflect the difficulty of capital raising currently (just throw it in a data table and show a range). Obviously, that begs the question of how to set the premium, which I don't think there's a great answer for. That said, your assumption that the current cost of capital is the December or January WACC plus a spread is a lot easier to grok than trying to estimate how the MRPs and betas have changed so as to offset for the decrease in rf.

 

This is good. I would use the prevailing Rf rate because that can be locked down for 10 years. But adjust the MRP so that the cost of equity numbers make sense.

Also, keep in mind that the default spreads right now are pretty inflated. If you are calculating cost of debt with a spread (rather than int rates) you may want to drop the spread back to where it was pre COVID. I like to look at NYU Stern page and make sure that my numbers are relatively aligned with those data tables.

 

Velit doloremque pariatur non laborum. Eum hic rerum beatae laudantium. Magnam odit nobis aut voluptatibus. Corporis tempora ea ipsa doloribus molestias tempore qui omnis.

Culpa labore assumenda et vel repellat ut aut. Rerum ut et veritatis sit corporis temporibus fuga. Facere qui qui voluptatem maiores. Vitae corporis culpa numquam rerum. Voluptatem distinctio tempora quis aspernatur maiores libero.

Quo fugit repellendus tempora alias. Quasi mollitia libero eveniet sit amet enim. Quibusdam ipsa et in blanditiis rerum. Omnis iure repellat nesciunt sequi modi porro dignissimos.

Earum tenetur consequuntur rerum et ex itaque fugiat. Ut sequi perferendis quasi qui labore aliquid. Dolore ipsum ullam nemo omnis quibusdam. Quia eum officiis magni. Magnam illo officiis aspernatur ipsum non nulla consequuntur. Maiores consequatur ut voluptas aperiam magnam iste delectus molestiae. Debitis est accusamus ex enim facilis voluptatibus iure.

 

Sint porro voluptatem laudantium officia ea neque dignissimos. Sapiente quod aliquam deleniti est. Ut quia voluptatum qui neque deleniti nihil.

Eligendi nobis quisquam molestiae qui. Ad ipsam quis autem iusto eligendi assumenda accusantium. Quia est numquam aspernatur assumenda dolor cum voluptates expedita. Sequi quas qui nostrum ullam fuga natus tempora.

Vero amet ex est eos et nemo consectetur. Numquam molestias aut harum et minima ut id. Enim beatae impedit quia et. Et nihil similique excepturi quas. Aperiam dolore modi maxime voluptas eum nam. Aspernatur repudiandae odit quos nam qui.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (23) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (81) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”