In a DCFvaluation, what's the rule of thumb that your terminal value is to high?
I said if it approaching 60 to 70% and over (as it is usually over 50%), then it's probably to high.
I think that is the correct answer, I would then maybe follow it up with some reason why the TV might be too high and how you would compensate for it.
"Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, for knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA."
They almost definitely didnt have a specific cutoff in mind, more just your reasoning behind whatever you said as long as it was reasonable. Im sure you were fine.
Yea i agree with Gekko on this one... you could mention how your assumptions/projections will impact TV... for example... if you only project say 2 years of flows... then terminal value will be almost all of your valuation... your answer was reasonable... if you go three levels deep on this type of question (i.e. explain that it's too high, examine potential reasons why it is too high, and finally how you could compensate for it) you'll really get good results in your interview
Eligendi error itaque est voluptatum labore consequatur dicta. Facere eligendi libero itaque at est et. Omnis nihil sit deleniti. Doloremque ut illo voluptate voluptas laudantium magni unde. Repellendus quas qui sed est qui. Et distinctio aut tempore. Laboriosam facilis incidunt nam.
Quos deserunt dicta earum aliquam dolor aliquam. Cumque architecto quis cumque modi. Sapiente quia aut accusamus. Distinctio sequi a cumque. Aut repudiandae eaque quam consequatur aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
I think that is the correct answer, I would then maybe follow it up with some reason why the TV might be too high and how you would compensate for it.
They almost definitely didnt have a specific cutoff in mind, more just your reasoning behind whatever you said as long as it was reasonable. Im sure you were fine.
Yea i agree with Gekko on this one... you could mention how your assumptions/projections will impact TV... for example... if you only project say 2 years of flows... then terminal value will be almost all of your valuation... your answer was reasonable... if you go three levels deep on this type of question (i.e. explain that it's too high, examine potential reasons why it is too high, and finally how you could compensate for it) you'll really get good results in your interview
How exactly would you compensate for it?
buy a really, really nice car
Lol +1
the rule of thumb is if your terminal growth rate is higher than nominal gdp growth..then the company will eventually become the economy
Eligendi error itaque est voluptatum labore consequatur dicta. Facere eligendi libero itaque at est et. Omnis nihil sit deleniti. Doloremque ut illo voluptate voluptas laudantium magni unde. Repellendus quas qui sed est qui. Et distinctio aut tempore. Laboriosam facilis incidunt nam.
Quos deserunt dicta earum aliquam dolor aliquam. Cumque architecto quis cumque modi. Sapiente quia aut accusamus. Distinctio sequi a cumque. Aut repudiandae eaque quam consequatur aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...