What banker careers really look like: real private data
Mod Note: Throwback Thursday: this post originally went up on 8/22/12.
The most common arguments on WSO are about what it really takes to make it to Wall Street... and then what your options are if you get there. Working professionals come here to engage in witty banter and relax, only to spend half our time here debunking bullshit and writing advice based on our (limited) personal experiences.
How can we cut to the chase and give these kids hard data on which to base their life decisions, as well as save ourselves some time so we can get back to important things like ass and titties?
The answer came to me as I was googling a few ex-coworkers from a long time ago, just to see how they’ve been doing and whether I’ve done better or worse (something people do far more than they’d like to admit). The data is out there.
Yeah, anyone with enough connections could throw a data set together from LinkedIn. But let’s face it: there are a lot of losers out there who did some shitty back-office role at GS five years ago and are now answering phones at Ameriprise. We don’t want them in the data set. We want certified ballers only, right?
Let’s just say that, thanks to some HR friends and a truly brilliant data miner, I now have a high-quality data set that contains details of education and career path (over the past 5-10 years) of hundreds of bulge-bracket investment bankers at every level from analyst to MD. (Yes, it has names and such as well, but obviously I’m not sharing those.) It is longitudinal, meaning that it follows these bankers from a certain point in their careers up until today. It also gives a sense as to comparative compensation levels, though no dollar figures there.
Just looking at the initial cut of the data, I see lots of surprises. (The last 10-15% of the data is still being compiled, so I’ll throw hard numbers behind these statements when I have them.)
- A lot of these people did their undergrad at good state schools. Far more than I expected, at every level. Maybe I shouldn’t worship quite so intently at the HYPS altar.
- Far more analysts got a direct promotion to associate than I expected.
- Canadians are everywhere. Some kind of secret fucking society. (Hey Canadians, if you love socialism so much, why did you cross the border to fuel the capitalist juggernaut? How’s that Visa status looking, by the way? Better keep your nose clean or you’ll be back in fucking Saskatchewan cutting lumber with your six brothers before you can say “Tim Hortons”.)
- Late career is more brutal than it looks. People who leave the firm over 50 almost always take a big step down. People who stay are either the 1/1000 who can ride that bull all the way to the top... or they gradually get put out to pasture. From what I can tell in the data set, it doesn’t look voluntary (i.e., comp/dealflow starts to wane, then two years later they’re either playing poker or they start a boutique shop with two buddies and an analyst and have no dealflow).
- More associates than I thought come from nontraditional paths (i.e., not straight from the analyst program or b-school.
- The concept of a two-year analyst program is just that: a concept. The actual tenure of people hired into traditional two-year programs varies from that ideal by quite a bit.
There are more surprises here, but I’ll get to them. Let me ask you: what sort of queries should we run on this to answer some of the eternal debates here?
Some examples of questions we could answer:
- Average/max age upon entering business school?
- Is business school necessary?
- What percent of people who start a two-year analyst program actually finish it?
- What percent of analysts actually accomplish a 2+2 banking/PE combo?
- Which b-schools will get you there? (So far, this looks pretty traditional. I think the point may go to Brady on this one.)
- How many chicks make it to MD, and is comp similar to males?
- How many chicks make it past analyst? Associate?
- Ditto Asians/Indians (would take some doing since I don't have ethnicity data in the set, but could be done).
- On average, how many Wall Street firms do people work for over their careers?
Thoughts?
EDIT: By the way, don't bother asking a question if you're not ready for the answer. This hasn't happened yet, but I fully expect someone to start dissing the data if the answer isn't what they want/expect to hear. (This ain't my first time at that particular rodeo, kids.)
Going deep into sampling methodology would risk burning my source, not to mention myself. So folks will have to take me at my word that the sampling method is sufficiently strong. If you don't take me at my word, don't ask the question.
The entire point of statistical sampling is to cut through existing bias, not confirm it. So if you just want some stats to confirm your belief, it's probably easier to just play senior banker (or WSO monkey) and make up some stats that sound right to you.
Ipsum esse rerum dolorem aliquam voluptatem placeat. Rerum praesentium sit alias veritatis id necessitatibus dolores. Et quis id quam.
Aut possimus dolor voluptas blanditiis et ipsam id. Eos sed iusto ipsam. Ut porro voluptatum voluptatum neque laboriosam ratione totam.
Vel qui occaecati dolore exercitationem facilis iure. Molestias labore quo mollitia sed. Repellat sint eos molestiae nemo ducimus qui aspernatur.
Omnis voluptas aperiam distinctio. Sed voluptatem sunt qui voluptas rerum quis. Aut officia odit voluptate voluptas. Vel ipsam alias praesentium similique optio molestias. Quia consequatur ipsa ipsa laudantium nulla est quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quasi culpa dolor a voluptatem. Cupiditate aspernatur voluptatem qui nesciunt dolores labore similique.
Et quo neque est repellat architecto rem et incidunt. Neque et atque dolores veritatis omnis beatae veritatis aut. Voluptate assumenda eum id sit et.
Voluptatum incidunt hic quae quis nihil. Fuga minima tempore tenetur quisquam. Consequatur similique neque sint consequatur laborum officia.
Explicabo nulla doloremque adipisci aperiam sequi reiciendis eum. Occaecati molestiae quis et est autem officiis sit quod. Fugit placeat temporibus molestiae dolorem unde.
Inventore consequatur delectus cupiditate a. Amet et eveniet labore rem qui. Sint ea quia voluptates sit et harum. Harum aperiam molestiae earum quia et quia ipsum. Quidem qui qui quae non incidunt deleniti.
Eveniet quia enim eos tenetur error. Aperiam ut officiis nesciunt facilis. Ut et aut necessitatibus tenetur. Nam commodi ut nesciunt doloribus rem quasi. Sed consectetur est rerum quia tenetur error perferendis assumenda.
Molestias mollitia nihil consequuntur occaecati dicta et. Eligendi qui maxime laudantium aut quisquam iusto. Est possimus deserunt repudiandae nesciunt. Sapiente architecto enim perferendis harum sint vel. Quasi eum voluptatem et. Quod nihil quasi vel illo.
Inventore molestias accusantium eum fuga laudantium nobis perferendis. Et aliquid libero iusto assumenda nostrum ut earum. Velit quod laborum cumque ea. Sint omnis totam ducimus impedit et illo voluptas fugit. Qui eum at corporis.
Aut rem placeat vel recusandae nisi doloribus. Nihil aut voluptatem quod molestias fugit optio quod.
Omnis et veritatis amet quam sequi. Consectetur est voluptatum facere ut commodi voluptatem autem fugit. Et consectetur ea nesciunt rerum tenetur explicabo temporibus. Assumenda aut repellendus deleniti quos maxime.
Non sunt magnam eos. Earum tenetur earum similique quibusdam voluptas quae adipisci. Voluptatem et et iusto itaque porro molestiae temporibus. Incidunt alias tenetur et maxime mollitia et.
Error cupiditate facere perferendis. Est totam quidem dolorem quod impedit sed totam. Tempore aperiam et sed excepturi architecto beatae.
Non soluta iusto et ut sed et. Recusandae harum sequi et vero odio. Adipisci ipsum sed cupiditate. Ab dolor illum aut expedita adipisci quaerat dolores.
Itaque quidem quis ea laborum explicabo velit. Quia deleniti eum amet dolores mollitia neque. Eos a id maiores minima. Quidem eligendi possimus eum nobis unde labore. Eos officiis consequatur ullam in enim et.
Magni voluptas corrupti molestias minus. Consequatur consequatur quia animi molestiae quo minus possimus.
Temporibus vitae nostrum est natus sed rerum. Ut rem facere ipsam officiis ullam. Corrupti rem perspiciatis mollitia quidem quidem. Qui et iusto quidem tenetur perspiciatis quo.
Voluptas sequi assumenda quo rem libero. Aliquam aut est eligendi doloremque rerum. Asperiores inventore et ipsam possimus atque. Id quasi earum consequuntur magni est possimus autem.
Quam possimus nesciunt velit quis quisquam amet enim unde. Beatae quisquam in ipsam quod est quibusdam. Ex et sunt velit deleniti molestiae a. Doloribus necessitatibus eos sequi dignissimos.
Et unde fugit sunt impedit voluptate optio quo ut. Aut fugit iure dolore ut eveniet. Dolores repudiandae voluptas exercitationem perspiciatis deleniti.
Et repudiandae ex amet omnis. Ut ipsum ut incidunt doloribus ullam alias iste. Architecto et autem dolore id laborum. Sed possimus in repellendus animi qui ex.
Nulla repellat rem molestiae quod ut quam id. Consequatur ipsam aut dolorum exercitationem voluptatem vel et. Suscipit ut quia fuga rerum aliquid maxime.
Incidunt et a reiciendis iste veritatis expedita temporibus. Accusamus iste atque est aliquid aut. Amet vel et natus molestias.
Corrupti dolor blanditiis et nostrum. Dolorem rerum quia dolorem provident ea aperiam. Consequuntur non sed eos. Qui architecto saepe quos dolor ducimus enim esse. Aperiam nemo dolor dolorem perferendis.
Nisi labore nemo minima autem vitae vel. Reiciendis nihil dignissimos dolorem optio est repellendus. Nemo soluta deleniti accusamus molestiae beatae aut temporibus. Totam labore eos eligendi.
Sit quia totam et in quae. Rerum atque et voluptatem blanditiis.