What sector have their own specific modeling?
Can someone shed some light on what industry group will usually have no transferable modeling skills? For example, FIG is more balance sheet driven modeling and O&G is also more sector specific modeling.
Can someone shed some light on what industry group will usually have no transferable modeling skills? For example, FIG is more balance sheet driven modeling and O&G is also more sector specific modeling.
| +228 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 44 | 2h |
| +168 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 3d |
| +111 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 15 | 20h |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 1d |
| +53 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 6d |
| +52 | London IB BB is a challenge | 33 | 2h |
| +38 | momentum of Rx groups | 12 | 1m |
| +37 | Fired during interview | 6 | 1d |
| +36 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 5d |
| +30 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 16 | 38m |
Career Resources
I would get the idea of there being 'no transferable skills' out of your head - the modeling skills developed in these groups are still great to conceptualize and learn how companies evaluate their financials and performance. You'll also pick up on the excel skills required to build a robust model (laying out the inputs, linking sheets, coloring, etc.) and beyond that it is not difficult to model a 'normal' EBITDA company
Generally specialized modeling groups: - FIG (banks, insurance, etc.) - O&G (more so upstream and midstream I believe) - Power and Utilities - Real Estate - Pharma - Mining - Restructuring
That said within each of these industries you will have a ton of 'normal' companies that provide services/products/etc. that will be modeled on a standard EBITDA basis
Curious to know how you see pharma as a different way of modeling it? SOTP of every drug?
I totally understand that understanding basic financial statement and metric are transferable. I guess I just didn't word my question correctly. I had the same question regarding power and utilities, real estate, pharma and mining about how they are sector specific modeling. Especially with power and utilities / real estate, they seem to be just simple spreadsheet business IMO. Maybe someone can shed some light on the type of modeling that's done in those industries.
P&U modeling varies a lot depending largely on the regulatory regime. For example in some states like California the utility regulator sets the return on capital for utilities in the state and you build a rate base model to arrive at the price of electricity ultimately authorized. (The income statement is more or less constructed backwards starting from permitted net income and ending with allowed revenue). You also might model a more traditional company, or something really random like a solar or hydro generation plant. It’s more complicated than that and rate setting proceedings/regulations vary a lot among jurisdictions but suffice to say you are exposed to a broad variety of modeling paradigms.
Is this some what similar to municipal financing? Where the biggest difference is that muni is more credit metric focus and debt financing.
In quod ex rem. Adipisci enim in voluptatem modi temporibus quae. Quo itaque accusamus sequi eum ad odit. Magnam qui sint libero laborum aliquid. Blanditiis assumenda aut aut aperiam corporis.
Et et quod culpa fugiat et. Natus cumque ad praesentium sed dolores error. Sit nemo culpa rerum. Qui voluptatem ut repellat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...