What sector have their own specific modeling?

Can someone shed some light on what industry group will usually have no transferable modeling skills? For example, FIG is more balance sheet driven modeling and O&G is also more sector specific modeling.

6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I would get the idea of there being 'no transferable skills' out of your head - the modeling skills developed in these groups are still great to conceptualize and learn how companies evaluate their financials and performance. You'll also pick up on the excel skills required to build a robust model (laying out the inputs, linking sheets, coloring, etc.) and beyond that it is not difficult to model a 'normal' EBITDA company

Generally specialized modeling groups: - FIG (banks, insurance, etc.) - O&G (more so upstream and midstream I believe) - Power and Utilities - Real Estate - Pharma - Mining - Restructuring

That said within each of these industries you will have a ton of 'normal' companies that provide services/products/etc. that will be modeled on a standard EBITDA basis

 

I totally understand that understanding basic financial statement and metric are transferable. I guess I just didn't word my question correctly. I had the same question regarding power and utilities, real estate, pharma and mining about how they are sector specific modeling. Especially with power and utilities / real estate, they seem to be just simple spreadsheet business IMO. Maybe someone can shed some light on the type of modeling that's done in those industries.

 

P&U modeling varies a lot depending largely on the regulatory regime. For example in some states like California the utility regulator sets the return on capital for utilities in the state and you build a rate base model to arrive at the price of electricity ultimately authorized. (The income statement is more or less constructed backwards starting from permitted net income and ending with allowed revenue). You also might model a more traditional company, or something really random like a solar or hydro generation plant. It’s more complicated than that and rate setting proceedings/regulations vary a lot among jurisdictions but suffice to say you are exposed to a broad variety of modeling paradigms.

.
 

Illo non error ut. Esse totam dignissimos possimus omnis aperiam aperiam. Optio ut veritatis corporis sunt eligendi.

Quae qui hic perferendis sunt. Eaque sunt doloribus quia minus ut aliquam. Voluptas aliquam veritatis tempora vel.

.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”