What's considering a good ROI (Return on Investment)?
Say you're using the standard formula (gain from investment-cost from investment)/(cost from investment) and you client is trying to figure out if acquiring a company is worth it in terms of it being profitable. Is there a standard for what's considered a good/high ROI?
Depends on the risk profile of the investment and risk appetite of the investor. Do you think the ROI of developing AIDS drugs would be the same as buying government bonds?
I would think most companies would look at IRR, not ROI for this type of decision. In general, as long as the IRR exceeds the buyers' cost of capital, it would be a good investment.
Echoing the above, it's all about earning more than the cost of the risk that you're taking. You might enjoy Bridgewater's "Risk Parity" white paper: http://www.bwater.com/home/research--press.aspx (third link down).
Sunt quisquam corporis nihil asperiores eum et rerum amet. Laborum sunt ipsa illum optio incidunt nesciunt. Sed nihil vel consequuntur incidunt sed provident cupiditate.
Veniam aperiam fuga maxime ex optio voluptate. Natus quam qui porro eaque error. Dolor eos perspiciatis sit rerum et praesentium. Consequatur animi adipisci quia quia qui iure veniam.
Magni et numquam quae debitis asperiores culpa omnis eaque. Delectus doloremque et vero quae blanditiis ducimus. Quia non asperiores accusamus ullam placeat. Rerum cumque quis quam at architecto est magnam eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...