How do candidates in top groups vs average/bad groups at banks such as RBC, Wells, etc fare during on-cycle PE recruiting? Do most analysts receive headhunter outreach and if so, which PE firms have you seen analysts from banks like these get interview traction at? I'd appreciate any insight
| +223 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 43 | 17m |
| +168 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 3d |
| +111 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 15 | 17h |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 1d |
| +52 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 6d |
| +52 | London IB BB is a challenge | 31 | 6h |
| +37 | Fired during interview | 6 | 21h |
| +37 | momentum of Rx groups | 11 | 1d |
| +33 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 5d |
| +29 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 15 | 47m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Bump
Bump
The average exit from all of these firms are LMM/MM firms. The top groups may have the rare kids exit into a UMM firm or a large MM firm. I want to note some exceptions like RBC PU&I exist where you can get some infra MF looks, but by and large the "top" groups at these firms exist mostly to MM firms(just better ones). There are very rare UMM exits, but again VERY rare.
Thanks for the insight. Would you say RBC M&A also falls into the same bucket as PU&I or is PU&I a clear step above exit-wise?
Please re-read my comment... but to not be snarky: PU&I gets INFRA MF PE looks because that's the sector it specializes in and is has a good record in the infra space. M&A and PU&I for generalists should be similar, but I would still guess PU&I is better because frankly, RBC PU&I is an actual good PU&I group across the street, M&A simply isn't. M&A is good relative to the firm, but not across the firm. Idt the delta is too huge, but it exists. I would for example rather pick a DB top group over RBC M&A any day of the week if my goal was to maximize exits but I most likely would not do the same for RBC PU&I(prob would for anything better than DB amongst the other BB's and EB top groups, but that in itself says a lot about how good PU&I is relative to others)
Quisquam molestias voluptates nihil quam nisi quis voluptas. Harum aut qui numquam aut quis. Ab enim excepturi voluptatibus ipsum repellendus. Soluta minima quasi blanditiis numquam. Molestiae reprehenderit dignissimos quia autem. Sequi odio eum voluptas debitis. Error et at aspernatur optio et eaque dolore.
Labore aut magni deleniti voluptas. Necessitatibus enim rerum dolores officiis vero ut. Vitae nobis voluptas exercitationem a eveniet. Tempora ea rem saepe praesentium ducimus. Sit est eum occaecati accusantium saepe cumque velit. Aliquid ut nemo nemo eum et aut officia.
Est eius laudantium necessitatibus enim amet facere non eius. Blanditiis dolor suscipit consequatur molestiae autem quo vel. Ut facere nam quos vel doloribus dignissimos aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...