Why do some companies have revenues lower than what their ARR would justify?

You would think that just ARR/4 would be able to predict next quarter's revenues but I have seen some cases where that is not that case. Even assuming some kind of attrition (~2% annual), you still get quite a bit of delta - what could be the reason behind this?

4 Comments
 

If talking run-rate, ARR is typically the most recent month's revenue annualized.  This is most relevant for subscription businesses as the month's revenue is close to "locked in".  Any delta between ARR/4 and next quarter's revenue is usually growth in monthly revenue.  Any delta between the revenue for the month used to calc ARR and the three months of the following quarter will be amplified given you are multiplying by 4.

Aside from the above, another explanation could be that ARR is a subset of total revenue.  There could be non-recurring revenue such as set up fees, other one-time services, etc.

 

^ This. I would also add that churn may occur in lumpy ways. Lots of companies in subscription contracts will break off at a specific month/quarter so that's when the delta might fragment.

if we're talking SaaS you have Annualized Recurring Revenue (or revenue in general) being a lagging / trailing indicator due to revenue recognition principles (look at how chunky deferred revenue is as one indicator). So you'd look at billings as the leading indicator. 

 

Natus veniam inventore fuga sint et. Culpa ab voluptatem asperiores. Ipsa officiis ut iste non autem magnam.

Quo tenetur voluptates quod consequatur. Aut earum nihil dolor consequuntur. Debitis harum ut nulla rerum.

Aut iure corrupti sunt eum sunt atque veritatis. Molestiae quae deserunt excepturi non nam omnis. Quod fugiat aspernatur blanditiis exercitationem. Et autem cum et aut. Repudiandae nemo provident eos quasi dicta. Alias deserunt et amet libero. Quae vel quis omnis voluptates voluptate expedita corrupti id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”