why do some co's have no "non-controlling" listed on their bs's when they obviously do have minority holders?
" "
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +88 | Drunk VP. How to manage? | 29 | 1h |
| +59 | [2026 - October] Unbiased Prestige Rankings | 25 | 1h |
| +58 | Who is the final boss in Houston Energy? (GS, JEFF or EVR) | 10 | 5h |
| +44 | Lazard US Views 2026/2027 | 16 | 21h |
| +42 | McK vs A&M Offer Decision | 22 | 3h |
| +39 | Moelis PCA vs Lower tier BB Coverage | 25 | 51m |
| +37 | Tomorrow Will Be Better | 5 | 1d |
| +36 | Why Do We Turn Comments? | 5 | 3h |
| +22 | UBS’s Investment Bank Is Building an AI Slop Factory | 2 | 1d |
| +21 | How early is to early? | 9 | 2d |
Career Resources
The non controlling interest refers to the companies ownership of other companies. For example: say Apple owns 75% of Beats and effectively controls Beats. Apple would then consolidate Beats financials with its own but because Apple doesn't own 100% of Beats, it need to reflect the portion that the other "non controlling" owners stake. That's why apple lists the minority interest position to effectively reduce it's ownership of beats financials.
Sint quasi possimus sunt aspernatur id inventore. Cumque molestias enim nihil.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...