Why does a discounted cash flow approach yield Enterprise Value? Newbies GTFO

When looking at Enterprise Value in a market approach, it gives you sort of the "bare bones" total firm value. It doesn't include any cash because you'd basically be paying cash for cash.

But in an income approach model you model cash as a component of current assets. As a company grows in size, it needs more and more cash to perform its operations. Therefore the contribution to the cash account each year in a growing company is a "use" of funds. So the DCF model would NOT yield an enterprise value, and instead it would yield Enterprise Value + operating cash..so would it be MORE accurate to say that the DCF approach gives us Enterprise value + operating cash?

10 Comments
 
HMGOr, would it be more accurate to subtract only EXCESS cash (instead of all cash) in the market approach when calculating EV?
Often touted as correct but hard to quantify "excess".
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
Best Response
HMGThen is it more common to subtract total cash or leave in all cash when calculating EV?

If we leave all the cash in, more aggressive multiple. If we take all the cash out, more conservative multiple.

Excellent thread on this topic: //www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/enterprise-value-and-minority-interest-1

But as long as your methodolgy is the same across the board it shouldn't matter.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

look the best way to think about substracting cash when calculating EV is as follow. you know that Assets=E+L; cash is an asset and therefore it is inherently accounted for in either your debt or equity (market cap) FV calculation, hence you substract it cause if you dont, you would double count it.

 

To tack onto Oreos's comment, that excess cash is really the correct number you should back out to get to net debt, the right way to think about the business' required "operating cash" is to think of it as a component of the Net Working Capital. As the business grows, it will grow its NWC as it carries greater inventories and A/R (less A/P), and also will need more operating cash to grease the wheels. Sometimes you look at the industry-wide cash as a percentage of revenues to determine whether the subject company might be carrying excess cash that should be taken out of firm value.

 

Good question, OP. To play devil's advocate to re-ib-ny, there are also plenty of industries where industry-wide cash levels are deceiving. One of these industries is big pharma; almost all of them have multi-billions of dollars on their BSs (unless they just closed a transaction). To take this a step further, almost all of them have greater than 50% of their cash tied up in foreign countries, waiting to be repatriated (but it never will be. it will just sit there).

Array
 

That's true too. So to combine what everyone has said so far: sometimes you'll look to industry norms to find "necessary operating cash," sometimes you'll make an educated guess, sometimes you'll treat all the cash as operating cash, and sometimes (probably most often) you'll just make a simplifying assumption and treat all the cash as excess cash. And this all goes back to Oreos original point: touted as correct but difficult to quantify.

 

Quis ea vitae velit nihil vitae quae. Iste praesentium voluptatum accusamus deserunt aperiam porro cupiditate. Et accusamus ut eos. Et rerum doloribus quia nemo sed. Earum delectus magni placeat.

Natus sapiente omnis voluptatem qui qui omnis porro. Aut labore distinctio qui tempora cumque eius perferendis est. Veniam quisquam dolores et. Molestiae architecto dicta rem distinctio pariatur suscipit occaecati. Mollitia omnis eum quos in. Velit magni laudantium sint occaecati nihil sit. Quia eveniet aut accusamus natus eum.

Illum qui nostrum sint neque omnis et. Qui deserunt pariatur assumenda beatae rerum pariatur asperiores. Vitae necessitatibus eum recusandae a veniam perspiciatis.

Rem soluta occaecati aperiam voluptas ut. Quasi est rerum nihil qui dolores. Asperiores id ut eos inventore eveniet est. Facilis quis incidunt animi consequuntur possimus sint maxime. Corporis ut at accusamus dolorem vitae. Vero deleniti distinctio rem.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”