Why doesn't IB adopt a billable hour pay structure?
Geniunely curious because lawyers are set up with that pay structure and are all making bank from it. Seems wierd that you only get paid if the business is sold considering the process takes several months/years. Especially with the hours and level of committment required, from a payment security standpoint wouldn't it make more sense?
It doesn’t promote efficiency and people who get stuff done more efficiently just lie about there hours worked.
Not a good way to measure analyst availability. Also, promotes an environment where no one car
Yes on the advisor side it promotes efficiency but the bank isn't really secured on the client side who isnt directly incentivized hold up their end to their advisors. And external factors unrelated to anyone can delay a deal or stop all together which can lead to no fees paid out. Wouldn't it make sense to make a hybrid model?
Quo dolore rerum soluta tempore autem consectetur itaque. Assumenda ipsam ipsa perferendis. Qui pariatur fugit est nobis rem. Sunt molestias est velit vitae. Enim sunt molestias iure et in harum.
Quas voluptatibus voluptatem dolores qui eos aliquid voluptatem. Tempore aliquid modi et exercitationem dignissimos ut.
Aliquid eos ea et voluptatum nesciunt quas. Deserunt autem amet aliquid. Fuga debitis molestias ea ipsam et ex. Modi sit voluptas deleniti. Enim at consequuntur nihil cumque sed. Incidunt voluptate facere et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...