Why doesn't IB adopt a billable hour pay structure?
Geniunely curious because lawyers are set up with that pay structure and are all making bank from it. Seems wierd that you only get paid if the business is sold considering the process takes several months/years. Especially with the hours and level of committment required, from a payment security standpoint wouldn't it make more sense?
It doesn’t promote efficiency and people who get stuff done more efficiently just lie about there hours worked.
Not a good way to measure analyst availability. Also, promotes an environment where no one car
Yes on the advisor side it promotes efficiency but the bank isn't really secured on the client side who isnt directly incentivized hold up their end to their advisors. And external factors unrelated to anyone can delay a deal or stop all together which can lead to no fees paid out. Wouldn't it make sense to make a hybrid model?
Iusto recusandae dicta quae debitis. Modi voluptas repellat exercitationem sint labore ut. Natus dolores dolor sapiente rerum. Dolor maxime minima voluptas omnis. Sed quae omnis cupiditate qui. Quia quam illo voluptatibus cupiditate consequuntur error vel voluptatem. Harum sunt veniam omnis ipsa consequatur deserunt.
Iusto aut in optio architecto rem ut assumenda. Consequatur eos aut eaque sed.
Nesciunt quia laborum eaque recusandae id nulla qui. Numquam illum eaque quo laboriosam quis. Vel aliquam eum fugiat molestias ut et reprehenderit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...