As the title states. Would a credit investor be more concerned about P/E or EV/EBITDA? I think it would be EV/EBITDA, but am struggling to come up with a good "why" answer to that.
| +234 | UBS Healthcare | 48 | 5h |
| +62 | UBS MDs Treat Employees like Dogshit, Data to Prove it | 9 | 9h |
| +59 | More diversity needed in the industry | 11 | 2d |
| +57 | Shana tova - happy new year | 9 | 1d |
| +48 | NYC Wall Street Run Club | 13 | 2d |
| +24 | Lost all ambition / don’t care at all anymore | 7 | 3h |
| +21 | Feeling a bad pattern forming. I need some help | 3 | 3d |
| +21 | What is the role of an analyst at your firm? | 1 | 2d |
| +19 | Reaching out to interviewer who rejected me | 2 | 3d |
| +17 | "Don't include firm in Cover Letter's file name" | 5 | 21h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
We care about EV / EBITDA - Capex.
EBITDA by itself does not fully account for the recurring cash needs of a business, so subtracting capex gives a better picture on valuation. A company could have great ebitda margins, but may have to spend a ton on capex, so not much free cash flow left over. That’s why better to compare multiples on an EBITDA less Capex basis.
Cash taxes are usually small or zero for distressed companies and assume working capital is zero.
Quisquam vel exercitationem est esse repudiandae repellat quidem adipisci. Aut corrupti ullam non voluptates sed sint ut. Error similique nesciunt aspernatur laboriosam cumque voluptatum sint qui. Voluptas neque voluptatum corrupti sed dolorem et dolor officia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...