As the title states. Would a credit investor be more concerned about P/E or EV/EBITDA? I think it would be EV/EBITDA, but am struggling to come up with a good "why" answer to that.
| +299 | I Snuck Into UBS Office And Took A Shit On The Floor | 28 | 11h |
| +287 | TPH V.S. Mizuho [HOU] | 36 | 1d |
| +244 | Why leave restructuring for M&A? | 30 | 11h |
| +229 | Best Power/Renewables/Energy Teams? | 38 | 9h |
| +223 | Houston 2026 Oil & Gas Investment Banking Rankings | 53 | 17m |
| +187 | Centerview HC group falling off? | 30 | 10h |
| +183 | Actual EB List | 27 | 20h |
| +177 | Predicted 1Q 2027 Story - UBS IB blames Outlook Outage for Down Quarter | 35 | 1h |
| +173 | Incoming TPH Analysts Larping as PWP on LinkedIn | 24 | 2h |
| +167 | How does getting staffed on an "account" work? | 40 | 1h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
We care about EV / EBITDA - Capex.
EBITDA by itself does not fully account for the recurring cash needs of a business, so subtracting capex gives a better picture on valuation. A company could have great ebitda margins, but may have to spend a ton on capex, so not much free cash flow left over. That’s why better to compare multiples on an EBITDA less Capex basis.
Cash taxes are usually small or zero for distressed companies and assume working capital is zero.
Tempore eum perferendis voluptas ratione. Odio pariatur id amet facilis libero iure dolorem. Voluptatibus corporis totam non aut in sed et cumque. Distinctio laborum tempora est ullam. Ullam enim voluptas voluptate qui. Et fuga neque laborum et libero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...