This was an interview question I got. I couldn't think of a scenario of when to do that so I just said no and explained my thoughts on how WACC = cost for all investors and how it pairs with uFCF
Thanks
| +228 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 44 | 2h |
| +168 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 22 | 3d |
| +111 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 15 | 20h |
| +81 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 42 | 1d |
| +53 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 27 | 6d |
| +52 | London IB BB is a challenge | 33 | 2h |
| +38 | momentum of Rx groups | 12 | 1m |
| +37 | Fired during interview | 6 | 1d |
| +36 | [WSO MODS] Please Delete This BS Host Books Spam! | 2 | 5d |
| +30 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 16 | 38m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Could be a trick question. You can use them when they are the same figure. If a company has 0 debt or interest, then technically WACC = Cost of equity and UFCF = LFCF so therefore they would be interchangeable.
Earum libero eos amet neque rerum. Molestiae neque quas iusto iure soluta rerum voluptatem cumque. Et aut optio et nihil deserunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...