All that you are asking for heavily depends on the company itself.
If the company has a good pipeline of projects in different stages of development and is backed by a large investor, you will receive pretty interesting experience and a fast learning curve working with different kinds of technologies (onshore/offshore, solar, power-to-x). Conversely, a small company won't give you such a wide range of expertise, and you will only be an expert in one technology.
Referring to my experience, I worked for a CEE-based company (with a 1.5+ GW portfolio), and my salary was four times the country's average. I worked 50+ hours per week and had a fast career progression thanks to a lot of projects. Additionally, I was involved in M&A projects.
As someone who has worked in project finance at developers and banks, I would highly encourage you to pursue the role if you are interested in renewable energy financing and investing. Working at a developer allows you to see at a much more granular level how renewable projects get developed and built. Project finance folks are typically involved at a pretty early stage in a project's development to provide guidance and support to the development team. If you are going to a utility scale developer, you will likely learn about permitting, interconnection, real estate, energy markets, and offtake contracts. You will also spend quite a bit of time modeling renewable projects, so will get plenty of excel experience. Once a project is ready to be built, you will likely be a key member of the team raising capital from banks and investors to finance the projects, which will entail building financial models, creating marketing materials, managing due diligence, and closing transactions. Hours will vary depending on if you are in the middle of closing a deal or not. If not, hours are probably 40-50 a week. If you are closing a deal, it could be up to 60-70. There is less of an expectation to work on weekends at a developer vs. a bank.
In terms of pay, it can certainly vary, but I would expect the following ranges (for utility scale developer):
In terms of company size, I wouldn't necessarily shy away from joining a smaller company. Some small developers are very strong. Also, at a smaller developer you will be given more responsibility faster and can move up the career progression ladder faster.
How do economics of the projects work for these developers? Are they typically joint ventures and they get promote? How is that usually shared with employees? What are typical waterfall structures and what is a typical project irr upon stabilization? Who are big project equity investors?
This is a good read. I've recently joined a utility-scale gentailer (generator / developer & retailing capability).
Because it is very large, I do get exposed to a lot of the things you mentioned, particularly working with different asset groups - mature (inc. gas/coal) and emerging tech, and as such I don't feel like it is a one-pony trick role (e.g: small developers that only just build solar or wind).
In these roles, I do find you're more skewed towards the 'asset technical/operating' side and ensuring the commercial/technical attributes are being maximised, as opposed to going to the nth level of nitty gritty financial engineering with capital structuring (not to say you don't as you still work with PF models and debt size, but won't have the sophistication like a bank).
Develop and flip - essentially bring the project to shovel ready and then sell to a long term equity investor or IPP at FNTP (construction start)
IPP - develops the project and holds it through construction and during operations. They will sometimes sell minority or majority equity stakes in projects to recycle capital into their development business.
The sale of a project by a developer typically wouldn't result in employee compensation, but depending on your level you might get equity in the company and if it is sold one day you can get paid out.
Project level equity IRRs vary widely depending on the technology and revenue structure. If a project is fully contracted for 20 years, the levered IRR might be 8-9%. If a project is fully merchant, it might be 15%
Big equity investors are any big infra fund (Macquarie, GIP, Brookfield, Quinnbrook, etc), pension funds, life insurance companies
Non qui explicabo nisi ipsa libero iure. Non consequatur et et enim. Ut blanditiis quia rerum quae non quis quam voluptas. Odit qui et ut et ipsa ut aspernatur minima. Velit animi enim aut sint aut consequuntur optio molestias. Fuga excepturi laborum quidem omnis assumenda.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
bump
Bump
following
All that you are asking for heavily depends on the company itself.
If the company has a good pipeline of projects in different stages of development and is backed by a large investor, you will receive pretty interesting experience and a fast learning curve working with different kinds of technologies (onshore/offshore, solar, power-to-x). Conversely, a small company won't give you such a wide range of expertise, and you will only be an expert in one technology.
Referring to my experience, I worked for a CEE-based company (with a 1.5+ GW portfolio), and my salary was four times the country's average. I worked 50+ hours per week and had a fast career progression thanks to a lot of projects. Additionally, I was involved in M&A projects.
As someone who has worked in project finance at developers and banks, I would highly encourage you to pursue the role if you are interested in renewable energy financing and investing. Working at a developer allows you to see at a much more granular level how renewable projects get developed and built. Project finance folks are typically involved at a pretty early stage in a project's development to provide guidance and support to the development team. If you are going to a utility scale developer, you will likely learn about permitting, interconnection, real estate, energy markets, and offtake contracts. You will also spend quite a bit of time modeling renewable projects, so will get plenty of excel experience. Once a project is ready to be built, you will likely be a key member of the team raising capital from banks and investors to finance the projects, which will entail building financial models, creating marketing materials, managing due diligence, and closing transactions. Hours will vary depending on if you are in the middle of closing a deal or not. If not, hours are probably 40-50 a week. If you are closing a deal, it could be up to 60-70. There is less of an expectation to work on weekends at a developer vs. a bank.
In terms of pay, it can certainly vary, but I would expect the following ranges (for utility scale developer):
In terms of company size, I wouldn't necessarily shy away from joining a smaller company. Some small developers are very strong. Also, at a smaller developer you will be given more responsibility faster and can move up the career progression ladder faster.
How do economics of the projects work for these developers? Are they typically joint ventures and they get promote? How is that usually shared with employees? What are typical waterfall structures and what is a typical project irr upon stabilization? Who are big project equity investors?
thanks!
Hi there - hope you're still active.
This is a good read. I've recently joined a utility-scale gentailer (generator / developer & retailing capability).
Because it is very large, I do get exposed to a lot of the things you mentioned, particularly working with different asset groups - mature (inc. gas/coal) and emerging tech, and as such I don't feel like it is a one-pony trick role (e.g: small developers that only just build solar or wind).
In these roles, I do find you're more skewed towards the 'asset technical/operating' side and ensuring the commercial/technical attributes are being maximised, as opposed to going to the nth level of nitty gritty financial engineering with capital structuring (not to say you don't as you still work with PF models and debt size, but won't have the sophistication like a bank).
Was that true in your case?
can i pm you?
There are typically 2 types of developers.
Non qui explicabo nisi ipsa libero iure. Non consequatur et et enim. Ut blanditiis quia rerum quae non quis quam voluptas. Odit qui et ut et ipsa ut aspernatur minima. Velit animi enim aut sint aut consequuntur optio molestias. Fuga excepturi laborum quidem omnis assumenda.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...