An Intro to MLPs, Part one

A master limited partnership (MLP) is a pass through structure much like a REIT. The limited partnerships are traded on exchanges as shares. Because they are structured as a partnership instead of a normal corporation they do not pay corporate level taxes. Rather, they are deferred to the limited partners who are taxed at their individual rate of their share of the partnership’s income. This tax structure avoids the double taxation of dividends resulting in a much lower required cost of capital.

The distribution’s made to limited partners come from the firms distributable cash flow instead of the partnership’s income. The distributions are not taxed as they are incurred but are reduction in the cost basis of the investment creating a tax liability until the shares of the MLP are sold. This means that only a minimal amount of the distribution is considered taxable and the rest is a return of capital. Because of these tax exempt distributions an MLP should be owned in taxable account and distributions to tax exempt account and tax exempt institutions may be considered an UBIT. As a result, MLPs are generally only held in retail accounts as individual stocks or in a mutual fund.

For a company to qualify as an MLP, 90% of income must be received from qualifying sources such as natural resources, activities associated with natural resources (exploration, production, transportation, etc.), interest, income derived from real estate and the sale of assets. This results in companies predominantly from the energy sector being MLPs. 107 of 140 of publically traded MLPs are in the energy sector. The majority of these companies are either upstream or midstream companies. MLPs allow investors to expose themselves to natural resources without investing directly into the resource while maintaining a low beta.

Part 2 will consist of information pertaining to distributions, the history and the future of MLPs.

9 Comments
 
Best Response

I still don't think the upstream has bottomed yet (drillers exploring for oil). The market usually takes a little bit of time to adjust upstream prices to reflect current projects going sour. Midstream and downstream could be interesting to load up on. Also if you're into yields and not just price appreciation, basically no midstream MLPs have lowered distributions.

It's hard to say for sure why MLP have gone down with oil price declines, but most people agree it has to do with a combination of fears that yields would get cut and that oil projects would become unprofitable with oil prices this low.

You're definitely on to something though. If you look at a lot of MLP Closed End Funds, they're trading at insane discounts to the actual underlying asset values.

I do agree that at least in Midstream MLPs the quality of businesses doesn't look like it's declined as much as their current prices would lead you to believe. This might be true in the Downstream as well. In the Upstream, I'm not convinced the MLPs are done going down yet.

 

Midstream damage occurs a quarter or two after E&P bankruptcy, which can modify or cancel transport agreements. Assets closes to well head have greatest leverage. MLP Management may be waiting until these events occur before they change their outlook, so you need to be careful

 

Aliquid quia soluta ea rem voluptatibus. Natus rerum numquam dolorem amet. Natus facere dolores et sed veniam nulla ex. Et eos porro sit voluptatum atque voluptates. Quia ducimus aut est repellat non iste. Minima iusto nemo ab aut. Aut est quia omnis in reprehenderit debitis incidunt.

Quam voluptatem odit magnam eos et ipsam distinctio. Quia reiciendis aliquam sunt. Quo dignissimos mollitia ipsa vitae aut dignissimos consectetur ut. Reiciendis consequuntur iure voluptas quas sit voluptas. Quod voluptatem et qui dolor vitae in. Provident praesentium sit vero laborum nam.

Molestias eligendi veniam aspernatur cupiditate ea ut nemo dolores. Architecto nihil cum culpa voluptatibus. Animi fugiat tenetur sed quia. Velit consequatur et modi et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”