BottomBucketHardo Has Gotten Out of Hand
So a few weeks ago there was a new troll account that popped up named BottomBucketHardo, he made probably 20 troll posts until someone made a post about him asking him to be banned and a few days later he was. Since then he has made many many accounts posting the exact same things. One is "ilovewaspybroads" (haven't seen it in awhile maybe it got banned too?).
This thread was posted by the same guy with a new account called topbuckethardess(you can tell by the way he writes and the content of the post): https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/ibd-is-no-…
This isn't his only account: /user/903399 (username hyugiyj) has created 1 thread and the title is the exact type of content that BottomBucketHardo. The title of the thread is "Dream Come True: Now Dating This Broad Who Lives In New Hampshire, Plays Lacrosse, Went To Williams & Mary And Vacations In The Hamptons." /user/903399 is also posting a ton on the post by "TopBucketHardess" (his other account) and presumably quite a bit with anonymous accounts. An issue is that he's saying particularly concerning things like called Africans inferior. Don't be me wrong i'm republican and am not PC at all but do we really need a guy on here posting stuff like that?
Every once in a while a troll pops up and does his thing and leaves but at this point this has to be an obsession. This guy has made so many threads with so many different accounts and is even talking to himself at this point. I haven't been browsing WSO as much as I did lately as I started as a first year and am busy but this guy should be banned by IP address or whatever (i'm think mods on here have the ability to?), not for our sake but for his own mental state.
Seriously there has to be something wrong with him to post this much. I don't even browse the forum that much and I see 5+ threads by him every time I open WSO. I shudder imagining the actual amount of threads he makes. The 4 accounts I've named are likely just a few assuming some have gotten banned at this point. I don't care that much as I can just avoid this website due to having work but should this not be a concern? To make this many accounts and post so many weird things. There has to be a legitimate mental issue the guy is struggling with.
You know it's quality shitpost when cucks write walls of text about you
Except in your case it isn’t a single shit post it’s like 200 on 15 different accounts you weirdo.
Based
His posts can be pretty fucked up, but I don't support banning him. I don't find the posts that distracting and they're easily avoidable.
the solution to bad discourse is not banning/censorship, it's better discourse
WallStreetOasis.com if this fuck begins posting spam like pornography or viagra pill websites or posting so many topics with the intent of manipulating the algos, fine get him out, but I'm completely against censorship
I mean he’s been banned multiple times and has had many threads deleted. Censorship isn’t a good excuse to keep him around seeing as mods have attempted to censor him.
At this point there should be some sort of punishment for circumventing bans by spamming so many accounts.
I mean you say this, but there was a guy a while back who kept posting some Shapiro stat on blacks committing the majority of violent crime which shows how they were an inferior race. All the responses were hell yeah, anyone who disagrees is a cuck, lmao what a cuck, ok cuck, etc. The fact that WSO quickly gets rid of ads but leaves this stuff up is pretty reflective of the founders' beliefs IMO.
There's reason APAE recently posted that he's been going to the site less and less...
in your example, who should we silence? the guy who posted a stat? the statistic is likely true. it's an inconvenient truth for me since 50% of my family is black, but it doesn't change the numbers. now, you and I both know that an issue as nuanced as race cannot be solved by a stat that doesn't tell the whole picture (ex post not ex ante). given that, do we ban the people who agreed with a shitty take? what rules do we apply to ensure this policy doesn't get abused? can people agree with shitty takes on IB rankings but not if it involves race? what about politics?
maybe I'm taking the censorship thing too literally but I think this is a slippery slope that at best can be applied inconsistently and at worse can turn into a weapon just to turn away opinions with which you disagree
finally, I've been putting up with idiotic takes on race my entire fucking life, it doesn't take anything away from me aside from time when I actually chose to engage and try to educate somebody. the only harm they're doing is showing the rest of the forum that they're dumb, to which I say have at it.
Qui doloremque quo debitis. Vel beatae sequi omnis est quod ipsum. Et iste quia dolore doloribus deserunt. Natus qui tenetur eos et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...