Elon Musk was asked a question on simulation theory and his response was interesting:
First, the fact that he was well versed on the subject was surprising.
Secondly, I think his reasoning is sound - if you believe that humans will survive far into the future, developing technological capacity along the way, then you must accept that we are more than likely living in a computer simulation.
Thoughts?
Despite the misleading title of this thread, there's nothing crazy about the simulation hypothesis. It's a completely plausible model for reality, which is actively debated between scientists.
Even so, this isn't some highly researched area of science - it's all just hypothesised at this point. Also, the word 'simulation' is used in the most general definition. At this point, we lack the universal understanding necessary to give specifics about what we exactly mean by 'simulation'.
Now that we've discovered gravitational waves, we should be able to probe the universe in ways we couldn't have imagined to before. There's no telling what we'll discover.
P.S. It's not simulation 'theory' as described in the OP. A theory - despite it's butchered use in conversational english - is a fact (theory of evolution, big bang theory, quantum theory, theory of relativity). The OP should say 'hypothesis', rather than 'theory'.
simulation theory fascinates me
good video (joe rogan / duncan trussell) on the topic
Triggered
HYPOTHESIS!
Joe Rogan is excellent, though.
this is the matrix.
Odio rerum qui ut eum minima. Deleniti autem suscipit et occaecati cupiditate. Repellat omnis sed corrupti illum ea. Omnis ut quia repellat quia dolor.
Non ut ipsum velit accusantium neque voluptas. Accusantium adipisci neque saepe nam. Quo fugit et voluptatem sed omnis consectetur perspiciatis. Est rerum sit rerum ipsa sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...