EV/EBITDA - future net debt or current

Was having a discussion about this today and wanted to get everyone's thoughts. If you were using a forward EBITDA beyond NTM, let's say 2020 - would you use today's net debt or 2019 net debt? This is in the context of valuing a stock

The argument for using 2019 is that in 1 year, you would be applying a forward multiple on forward numbers (2020), so to get the stock price a year from now, you would use the 2019 net debt. This makes a difference obviously if the company is deleveraging as using current debt on a NTM + x time frame understates the potential return?

However, I feel like conventionally I've seen more people use current net debt in this situation - would appreciate any thoughts

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful
"lab" Was having a discussion about this today and wanted to get everyone's thoughts. If you were using a forward EBITDA beyond NTM, let's say 2020 - would you use today's net debt or 2019 net debt? This is in the context of valuing a stock

The argument for using 2019 is that in 1 year, you would be applying a forward multiple on forward numbers (2020), so to get the stock price a year from now, you would use the 2019 net debt. This makes a difference obviously if the company is deleveraging as using current debt on a NTM + x time frame understates the potential return?

However, I feel like conventionally I've seen more people use current net debt in this situation - would appreciate any thoughts

You do realize a multiple — whether it’s 5x 2025 earnings or 12x today’s earnings — is just a simplified DCF, right? It’s all in PV terms, so use the present value of debt.

 
"lab" Thanks for the responses - seems to be two conflicting views above?

If you use current net debt, how do you reflect the increase in equity value in a deleveraging scenario?

Again, your capitalized EBITDA (serving as a proxy for cash flow) is the PV of all the future cash flows you’d be using to pay down debt...

You can pay down your debt $10 a year for 5 years or $40 today (or whatever the PV of $10 for 5 years running is at your WACC). Same thing.

 

Quo et a rem fugit et ipsa. A repellendus eligendi commodi ut in.

Natus est odio vel ea eos facilis distinctio. Enim suscipit architecto dolor sint impedit dolorum ducimus corporis. Iste qui nulla omnis cumque voluptas ut nihil blanditiis. Recusandae placeat ullam omnis eveniet expedita.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”