Here's The Math That Won Two Economists The Nobel Prize, And Helped Us Better Understand How People Date

This year Alvin Roth and Lloyd Shapley are splitting the Nobel Prize for Economics, and it's about time.

Each has made a huge impact on both the theory and the real world practice of economics, and have saved thousands of lives in doing so. 

Shapley is the more senior of the pair, and scores the prize for his work on — of all things — dating and marriage. 

Shapley is favored for something called the Stable Marriage Problem, which goes like this:

Say that you have a population of an equal number of men and women, all of whom are dating someone in the set at the moment but want to get married to an ideal partner down the line.

Each person has ranked every member of the opposite sex in order of preference. The goal is to make a stable marriage for every single person in the group. 

A solution occurs when everyone in the set is married to someone, and no two people of the opposite sex prefer one another to their current partner. For instance, let's say Fred is with Wilma and Barney is with Betty. If both Barney and Wilma would prefer to be married to one another rather than their current spouses, the marriages aren't "stable." 

Shapley designed an algorithm with David Gale to solve this problem in 1962. It's iterative, which means that the algorithm runs several times before a stable situation is found. The algorithm guarantees that everyone gets married and all marriages are stable. 

Here's the process: 

  • First, the algorithm matches each man to the highest ranked woman whom he hasn't yet proposed to. 
  • If that woman is free, then they become engaged. If not, the algorithm checks to see whether she prefers her current fiance or the new suitor. 
  • If she prefers the suitor, her current fiance becomes single and the new pair becomes engaged. 
  • If she prefers her fiance, they remain engaged and the suitor moves down to the next on the list. 
  • This process is repeated for each man. By the end, everyone is engaged and every pairing is stable.

The goal here is stability, not perfection.

While this wife-swapping may sound callous, the solution Shapley found was later expanded by Roth to make kidney donor matching, New York City High School matching, and the program that matches first year residents to hospitals that want them. 

That's why these men got the prize.

Shapley's work on matching problem theory and Roth's work on implementing them in the real world is an excellent example of practical economics at its best.

You can't sell a kidney, so a typical market can't work with the kidney donor allocation system. Roth's upgrade to the kidney exchange system — the same one that resulted in a simultaneous six-way kidney transplant in 2008 — saves lives every day. 

3 Comments
 

somebody won a Nobel Prize for that? either you're oversimplifying the algo, or I'm missing something. that looks like straight-up common sense.

 

Similique corporis sint non voluptatum dolorem enim id. Nulla ullam facere nam aut. Laboriosam quisquam nam explicabo impedit maxime nisi quia. Molestias adipisci quas natus incidunt. Nisi sunt rerum quis omnis omnis voluptate. Qui molestiae unde explicabo modi eaque sit.

Voluptas beatae sint sint quasi soluta laudantium minima tempora. Nam consequatur rerum et voluptates quam.

Howard Schwartz See my WSO blog

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”