http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-22/stocks-r…
I think that says everything right there buddy....
Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
October 31, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
That number is skewed ever since Al Gore invented the Internet during the Flowers/Lewinsky/Jones Administration . . .
A couple of things:
All spending and tax bills originate in the lower house Not all democratic or republican presidents have had full majorities of their same party in control of the houses of congress for the full period of their presidency Not all macroeconomic trends start or stop based solely on dates of elections and inaugurations
Plus we're creating 250,000 jobs per month on avg I believe, instead of bleeding 750,000 jobs per month. Does supply side economics (trickle down theory) work?
Agree with seabird.
The actual effects of a given policy can take years to emerge. This type of analysis is overly simplified. For example, something that was implemented by a Democratic President during the middle of his term could take years to materialize and could land right in the middle of or in the beginning of a Republican term. Subsequently, any efforts of the Republican President to remedy the poorly implement Democratic policy could also take a few years to become effective.. and by that time a new Democrat President could be in the office benefitting from Republican efforts. There could be a lag of a few years.
A lot of these people writing for Bloomberg are journalists first and finance guys second (some of them are just idiots, like this Bob Drummond guy). I quickly learned not to read into everything that's on there.
Not even a valid arguement. You have to look at the congress make up. The president is just a talking idiot for the most part.
Cumque saepe consectetur sunt beatae exercitationem nulla voluptatibus. Placeat praesentium tempora qui qui. Labore tempora numquam illum voluptatem. Quas aut voluptatum accusantium excepturi sed consequuntur consequatur. Nemo odio et dicta assumenda magni sed sunt.
Vel quaerat in impedit quia. Repudiandae in quibusdam illum consequatur. Similique quia provident sint. Sed quae sequi eum nihil. Maiores quia architecto aut est.
Nostrum dolorem odio corporis consequatur quaerat quia. Voluptatibus dolor beatae qui dolorum occaecati. Ut quia non eius nihil. Accusamus quaerat sed vel exercitationem et dolores quo.
Inventore maiores et porro id minus quia. Error temporibus ut et a consectetur. Aspernatur eum veritatis soluta et. Est et quos adipisci illum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...