Is Roger Federer The GOAT?

Last week Roger Federer emerged victorious at Wimbledon, winning his 19th Grand Slam and his 8th Wimbledon title. Fededer has won 91 of 102 matches at Wimbledon, since his first appearance in 2003. This article places him 4th in all time tennis players behind Helen Hills Moody, Serena Williams, and Steffi Graf. However, this article makes the argument that he indeed is the GOAT of tennis.

So what about being the GOAT in terms of all sports, Federer has to have a spot fairly high. This article places Federer alongside Leo Messi, Tiger Woods, Michael Phelps, and Tom Brady as the 15 most consistently successful modern athletes. Bleacher Report names Federer the 11th greatest athlete of all time, behind Tiger Woods, Bobby Orr, and Babe Ruth.

  • What do you think? Is Federer the GOAT of tennis? Top 10 greatest athletes?
49 Comments
 
"BillBelichick37" It's like arguing who was the best CEO in 2006.

Jack Welch

Winning.

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

You can't be the "best" when you are ranked behind a woman in an athletic endeavor. Given the disputable but "talking point" stat that Johnny Mac said if Serena Williams played in the Men's league she would rank 300 means that Federer is the GOAT...at tennis. How can Serena be ranked above Federer when she would be ranked 300 currently if there were no gender divisions in sports.

 

Federer is most likely the GOAT in tennis at this point in time. The first article is just weird and the second one makes sense. Overall, I find it incredibly difficult to compare athletes across sports in order to rank them.

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 

Even comparing the same sport across different eras is incredibly problematic. The NBA's huge shift to a 3 shooting league - Larry Bird averaged 1.9 3 point attempts per game for his career. Also, today's required dedication to exercise and nutrition has never been higher. I think a lot of great players from previous eras would not cut it today.

Listen, here's the thing. If you can't spot the sucker in the first half hour at the table, then you are the sucker.
 

He is the greatest of all time in tennis for sure. He is definitely in the top of being the greatest in all sports. Not in terms of athleticism but in the term of dominance. Best argument for this is that he finished, in 23 straight grand slams, in semifinals or higher during his peak. He has won 86% of his matches in major tournaments. Not to mentioned winning 2 grand slams this year at 35 years old...

 

Are you serious? You'd put Federer as an athlete on the same level as Russ Westbrook, Lebron, Kobe, etc.? You're insane dude. No doubt he is a good athlete but as far as being at the top? No chance.

 

Huge Tiger fan here, but not sure how anyone can rank Tiger ahead of Fed at this point. Fed's had a long period of sustained excellence than Tiger, and has arguably been equally as dominant. In the .01% chance that Tiger resurrects his career and wins a couple more majors ala what Fed has been doing, then I think the comparison would be really close.

 

Comparison was really close in the 2000's. Now, not so much. I think Tiger Woods is like the Mike Tyson of golf. Both were absolutely enigmatic and miles above their competition in their prime but never reached the GOAT due to personal choices.

 

That Bleacher Report is all sorts of nonsense. The Telegraph putting Messi in the consistently successful athletes is... questionable (you can argue Spain and Germany have had more complete teams than Argentina since Messi's rise, but not winning a Copa America is inexcusable considering the squad Argentina has had).

But Fed is the GOAT of tennis, no question. His longevity in an very competitive era, the way he plays... the best.

 
"Marshmello" You're comparing apples to pears in my opinion. From the standpoint of appreciating the level of tennis/athletic complexity, Serena's game isn't even in the same existential dimension as Rogers. Anyone in the collegiate or professional ranks will tell you that there are college guys & even junior boys players under the age of 18 that can double bagel Serena & any other WTA player for the matter no questions asked. The mens sport is so multidimensional from the standpoint of power, speed, variation in shots, &** even amount of sets played** lol. Not trying to be sexist here, but that is a fact that must be understood in consideration of the difficulty mens tennis professionals in the ATP have to face.

you're an idiot for even mentioning serena vs. men players.

If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!
 
"WalMartShopper" sorry but serena is goat of tennis. her first grand slam was 3 years prior to federer by the way.

men's will always get the most attention, but serena is a dominant force that will not be seen again for some time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_career_achie...

Federer is competing against the big 4 constantly during what is a golden age in tennis, the next gen of young players is also forming and are very competitive (Raonic etc). He has to play these superhuman modern tennis types like Djok' and Murray (6'4" , wingspan covering 1/3 of baseline, faster, more conditioned etc) and he is still whooping people's ass.

Serena is great but the competition she faces is weak, no comparison

 

this only reinforces my point. the fact that for the past 24yrs she's literally owned everyone almost all the time, with a much better record than federer. it's like saying mayweather didn't fight heavyweight where there are more big names means he isn't a great fighter. youre painting a bullseye around your arrow. i could easily flip that argument and say that serena's game is so elevated beyond the competition it's uncanny...and if you look at her accomplishments you'll realize this is the case.

"dutchduke"
"WalMartShopper" sorry but serena is goat of tennis. her first grand slam was 3 years prior to federer by the way.

men's will always get the most attention, but serena is a dominant force that will not be seen again for some time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_career_achie...

Federer is competing against the big 4 constantly during what is a golden age in tennis, the next gen of young players is also forming and are very competitive (Raonic etc). He has to play these superhuman modern tennis types like Djok' and Murray (6'4" , wingspan covering 1/3 of baseline, faster, more conditioned etc) and he is still whooping people's ass.

Serena is great but the competition she faces is weak, no comparison

If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!
 

Let me put this there so that we understand the difference between GOAT Athlete and GOAT Tennis

Deion Sanders: All around athlete

He was drafted in college by the New York Yankees and spent most of his MLB career with the Atlanta Braves. Sanders used his speed well, stealing 186 bases in his career. He’s the only player to ever hit a home run and score a touchdown in the same week.

Speaking of touchdowns, Sanders is one of only two players to score a touchdown six different ways: rushing, receiving, kick return, punt return, interception return and fumble return; talk about versatility. In his time in the NFL, Deion was voted to eight Pro Bowls, won Defensive Player of the Year, won two Super Bowls, and was eventually inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

The man who ran a 4.1 40 at his pro day is arguably the greatest cover corner to ever play the game.

(Bleacherreport)

DC
 

Bo ran a 4.1 40, not Sanders. Prime ran like a 4.24.

Bo won the heisman, played baseball and ran track against an Olympic medalist.

26 Broadway where's your sense of humor?
 
"SeekingAlphaDC" Let me put this there so that we understand the difference between GOAT Athlete and GOAT Tennis

Deion Sanders: All around athlete

He was drafted in college by the New York Yankees and spent most of his MLB career with the Atlanta Braves. Sanders used his speed well, stealing 186 bases in his career. He's the only player to ever hit a home run and score a touchdown in the same week.

Speaking of touchdowns, Sanders is one of only two players to score a touchdown six different ways: rushing, receiving, kick return, punt return, interception return and fumble return; talk about versatility. In his time in the NFL, Deion was voted to eight Pro Bowls, won Defensive Player of the Year, won two Super Bowls, and was eventually inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

The man who ran a 4.1 40 at his pro day is arguably the greatest cover corner to ever play the game.

(Bleacherreport)

Deion is a great athlete, no doubt. However, he is not the GOAT of tennis. Should be obvious, yet this is the topic at hand. Thus, why Deion Sanders has not been mentioned so far. I know it seems strange to you, but, in time, you will understand that people were simply answering the question. Not the question they wish was asked.

Alternately, you could try for a role in politics.

 

I understand your point ! Was just pointing out the fact that even though Fed is a great tennisman ..I do not consider him top 10 athlete (like he asked at the end of his post)! Definitely GOAT Tennis!!

DC
 
"WalMartShopper" Federer wins aus open at 36. He da man

hahah glad to see that butthurt loser is still here.

"i'm going to get him, this monkey shit will teach him" lol

If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!
 

Impedit facere explicabo ipsa eum sit sint pariatur. Quo quas modi qui provident. Ut natus placeat aut et molestias nisi. Repudiandae earum ut laudantium voluptatem. Dolorum quod doloremque temporibus. Deleniti optio natus eos. Omnis sed porro consequuntur rerum quis.

Ad ea nisi sequi velit. Et omnis exercitationem magni porro quo repellat.

Amet voluptates unde sunt odio dolores explicabo. Exercitationem nihil earum laudantium sit qui aut. Impedit et voluptate tenetur qui. Id autem iure asperiores similique at officia. Voluptatem architecto quod sunt qui non porro vero.

Ad architecto doloremque sint sit non mollitia aliquid. Eaque qui voluptatum ut ut ut. Ratione corporis eius maxime alias.

 

Magnam dolorem ut voluptas nulla dolore atque quis. Autem adipisci id sit voluptas reprehenderit. Rem modi aut eligendi nisi tempora. Quibusdam fugiat alias qui.

Aut animi sed ex accusantium non earum. Voluptatem reiciendis pariatur sequi ipsa fuga animi nesciunt.

Voluptatum sed similique maxime nam. Rem dolorem consequatur explicabo vel magnam facere maxime enim. Ullam hic ducimus quo. Debitis quisquam voluptatem dolorem et fugit quasi debitis. Consequuntur eos et dolorem numquam et placeat. Ratione nisi qui ut voluptatum odit.

If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”