People who are "bored" of their jobs please explain what you mean, why not just get a hobby?

People who work 50-80 hours a week for 5, 10, 15 years don't want to feel bored all day every day?

Agree with everything above. Couple of things I'd add:

1. as cfperson123 stated, for most people, the dream is "getting there". That's in any field. A 12 year old will tell you they want to "open a bakery" not "have a 40 year career as a baker". It's "get to the NBA" not "play 15 years in the NBA". As I always say, school is about how fast you can run, being in the real world is about where to run to, you don't have to be the fastest, you have to know where to go. 

2. Most people don't have constructive hobbies. A lot of people, esp in major cities, their hobbies are drinking and eating. Kind of hard to just do that day after day. 

3. Life is like a movie or a trilogy of movies. Why are most movie trilogies bad, because its hard to figure out what comes next. Same in life. Take that move Will Smith was in, "The Pursuit of Happiness", its about it getting a job and being okay financially, thats where it ends. The movies not about him having a long career or theres no part 2 where he just works on screen for 2 hours. Same with life. 

I've always taken this to mean that people are bored with the actual tasks at work, not that they desire more of the same boring stuff to consume their evenings and weekends. At least every time I've said I'm bored at work that's what I've meant. You're right though in that people who feel this way tend to be lacking outside interests (and in my experience are physically and / or mentally unfit and swirling in depression whether they realize it or not). I can't imagine actually not wanting two weeks off if it's a freebie.

Whether people want to admit it or not, work takes up a large part of our lives, especially in industries like finance, big law, etc where the hours are very long. It's great to have hobbies and things to look forward to after work ends, but they don't change the fact that we spend a lot of time at work. Thus, if you find the work tedious or inane, you're going to be miserable no matter what. Making a shit ton of money or having a bunch of cool hobbies has no bearing on you feeling miserable sitting in a cubicle from morning to evening doing tasks that you're completely checked out on. It's also why at a certain point, money becomes less and less of an incentive. You look at any successful person, and I can guarantee you that they're at least somewhat interested or engaged in what they're doing

.

It is hard to get a hobby when I am working 80hrs to 90hrs a week coupled with cramming the few morsels of free time I have to keeping a clean place + staying in shape + maintaining existing friendships (1 social exp a week) + prepping for buyside interviews.

So if you don't like your work AND it takes up your entire time, then yes when work is boring / annoying / deeply inefficient, its effects will be 100x amplified due its very presence in my life versus a corporate worker who clocks out at 6pm to enjoy his life

I think people fundamentally view their jobs in two ways. One where it's just a means to an end. You clock in, do your work, get paid and get out. Two, it is the end in and of itself. Your job is not only your means to support yourself/your family but also fulfills your sense of identity and meaning. For these people, it's not enough to park their mental stimulation in external hobbies because they want to fully invest themselves in their careers. I'm not here to pass judgement on which is right or wrong, but you're the former and the people you're questioning are the latter.

As a professional you spend anywhere from 40-80 hours a week at your job, at the beginning of a banking career it may be 100 hours a week. That’s a huge chunk of your waking hours to think god I’m sitting here rotting. A hobby at best case is what 10-20 hours a week? That doesn’t make up for hating a huge chunk of your life.

OP - think the above posters have all made really good points, would 100% agree with what they've said. To maybe expand on some of it, personally I would divide people (based on my own personal experience) into 2 categories:

- "Work to live" types - these are people who just see a job as a job, they may do it very competently still but as soon as they leave work they immediately forget all about it. They see work as just a requirement to live and nothing more. I have a few friends and family members in this camp, they typically have tons of hobbies outside of work - so in some ways they live quite rich/interesting lives. However I think very few people here on WSO would be in this category (myself included) as we have the mindset/drive that isn't satisfied by a "standard 9-5", even if it means we can rush out at 5:01pm to get to our spin or football class every single week without fail. Now of course there are some jobs that don't justify being thought of outside of work particularly, e.g. I doubt a toilet cleaner is thinking much about how they can do better on their next shift, they're just trying to make enough to survive. So I'm probably talking more generally about jobs here. Equally I don't think this "9-5" mindset is linked to pay - for example I wouldn't say a nurse is a "work to live" type job, as it requires a lot of training and the nurses I have known will frequently work extra hours (often unpaid) or study extra skills/qualifications in their own time.

- "Live to work" types - describes most people on here. Now of course I don't literally mean your career is your entire life - especially as I've gotten older (in my early 30s now) I've realized the importance of making time outside of work for friends/family/relationships/travelling etc, otherwise what on earth is the point of it all? Having said that, especially in your early 20s I did 80-100hr weeks in IB, and I have no regrets about that - I found the work very varied and interesting (I still do in fact!), and I took pride in the fact that I was learning a lot every single day. So it wasn't just the pay that motivated me. And I think if I went into a job where I was still well-paid but offered very little stimulation, I would start to get frustrated - and whilst hobbies outside of work might mitigate that to some extent, they couldn't cure it completely.

Now in reality the above 2 groups are the extreme tail ends of the chart - most people fit somewhere in between these. If someone though is complaining as you described, my guess is if they're a "work to live" personality then they probably just do need to be more proactive and get more hobbies. However for the types of personalities you see here on WSO, it's not quite as simple - a) we may not have the time with work (although arguably there's always a way to carve out some time during the working week), or b) hobbies may not give us what we need.

Finally, as someone above said - most people on here will have been on a very defined path throughout their life up to now - get the best grades = winning, go to the best college = winning, get the best IB analyst job = winning. Life up to that point is quite simple in that regard. However past that point there's no suddenly no simple answer - i.e. is the guy who works 100hrs a week at age 30 in PE making $500k still "winning" even though he has no girlfriend or hobbies/life outside work? Or is it his friend from college in a cushy corporate development job making $150k a year in a LCOL doing 40hrs a week, with a wife and 2 kids? The problem is there's no right answer here - it's purely for the person to decide, unlike their whole life up to now. So my guess is some people may be venting at a frustration they feel over the uncertainty of where their life is going vs. what it's supposed to be like (I've certainly been there myself!)