Not trying to pick a fight here, just genuinely curious how you conservabros react to the latest revelations regarding trump telling Cohen to lie and possible obstruction charges with various other sources of evidence beyond just Cohen trying to save his ass. Also if possible I would ask that you refrain from just bashin the source since that’s just a waste of time (I.e. if your answer is “don’t believe it” that’s fine but I’m more interested in your thoughts “if it turns out to be accurate”).
Trending Content
| +30 | ADHD ! | 14 | 12h | |
| +29 | Non-Competes Banned | 35 | 1h | |
| +29 | Being Christian in investment banking | 14 | 3d | |
| How do I become Sigma | 15 | 1d | ||
| +19 | Moelis has the cutest Analysts? | 4 | 2d | |
| +18 | Best NYC neighborhood for single 30M | 12 | 4d | |
| +16 | Underage intern, drinking? | 7 | 2d | |
| +13 | Secretive vs Universal Prestige? | 7 | 2d | |
| +10 | What are divorce rates in IB? | 13 | 4d | |
| +9 | Drunk in an interview | 5 | 3d |
Career Resources
deleted
It's from the journal, bro
deleted
Youre gonna have to improve your reading comprehension if you want to do well enough on the gmat to get into a top tier business school: https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/how-to-study-for-gmat-reading-comprehensi…
fair enough, SB for you
Not a "Conservabro" but honestly given the current political climate if there isn't any hard proof I don't think this is going to pan out to much... It'll be a He said he said situation. The fact that Cohen has perjured himself before definitely doesn't help his case here either and will 100% be used as a counterpoint.
One common argument I've been reading is people using this as a way to point out the fact that Mueller has gone "way beyond his scope". I disagree, first of all he hasn't gone beyond his scope and also even if you assume he has, it doesn't matter. You don't review security footage to find out about crime A and see another crime occurring in the footage and just let it slide / forget about it...
T
Looking forward to all the MAGA toads blowing past this guidance, since they haven't had a solid leg to stand on to defend him since he came down the escalator 3 years ago.
https://www.apnews.com/58e8eff8dabb4b5289e4db16435a2b02
Yeah, assessing the credibility of a news source = “MAGA toad”
I don’t really understand the question. What is there to discuss? There is either hard evidence (recording, e-mail, text) of this incident or there isn’t. Who cares about what people think? It’s what you can prove.
Hic harum dolores excepturi non. Consequatur illum omnis maxime consequatur aut. Ipsum molestiae repudiandae aut ut sit ut autem.
Numquam illo iure nihil magnam quis mollitia. Molestias est eum pariatur consectetur. Dicta repellendus est enim dolor et voluptatem delectus. Repellat placeat voluptatem fugiat neque. Officia sapiente totam consequatur odit voluptas minus. Eaque nihil libero ut. Sit odio aut quis quos. Magnam dolor rerum possimus voluptas pariatur exercitationem.
Tenetur qui dolores magnam ut rerum. Architecto cupiditate sit quibusdam laboriosam temporibus alias adipisci. Possimus nemo hic provident mollitia commodi dolor quia corporis. Mollitia dolores excepturi quibusdam non voluptas aut. Et qui ut ut autem qui nihil officiis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...