Waddell & Reed and the flash crash hypocrisy
Halloween's only three weeks away and we have a brand new witch to hunt. By now, everyone has heard of Waddell & Reed and how the Kansas City mutual fund is reason du jour for the end of capitalism and further legalizing of market manipulation.
As the story goes, on the afternoon of May 6, 2010 an algorithm propelled sell-off of $4.1 billion of futures contracts linked to the S&P 500 sent the market reeling. As with all good witch hunts, Waddell hasn't officially been named, but via leakage that would make the BP oil spill seem tame in comparison, we have our new villain.
I can hear the sound of Blankfein's cheeks stretching into a grin. It sounds like press on nails on a chalkboard.
The fund's leading trader is named Michael Avery. Remember that name, whether it will reach the Hall of Shame depths of Jerome Kerviel and Bradley Birkenfield, nobody can say for sure. But he's definitely the next big scapegoat of the roundabout finger-pointing routine that has become our daily reality. Anybody seen Groundhog Day with Bill Murray, lately?
Good flick, reminds me of our financial news over the past year.
Waddell is being painted as "the mutual fund which traded like a hedge fund". In other words, they are those evil capitalists protecting their clients interests and maximizing their returns. The nerve of this slick Midwestern folk. Taking risk and then...hedging it!
The fund has taken in $21 billion in capital since 2005 and has averaged an annualized growth of 11% over the past 5 years. Now this is a bit of info which bares an interesting inference.
The words of Morningstar analyst Kevin McDevitt underscore a scary reality:
"Any time you are hedging you are cutting risk, but the way they do their hedging, the fact that they are putting hedges on and off quickly, means they are more tactical than most of these funds. It means they can get caught on the wrong side of the market. What we are tying to get to the bottom of is whether the fund is too big for the types of trade it is trying to execute and whether there is a judgment issue as they were trying to put on this kind of trade while the market was falling."
In other words, when you make too much money and get too good at protecting your own interest, you should be investigated. What's scary is that these aren't the words of a regulator, but a market observer and tangential participant.
I see nothing wrong with what Waddell & Reed did on May 6th. They traded. They saw movement in markets and reacted. I implore someone to tell me why this newest witch hunt should even be a story.
Let alone the one gathering all the headlines and attention.
Praesentium perferendis et ut praesentium. Excepturi officia et omnis quia.
Quia et impedit inventore exercitationem provident ducimus pariatur. Ducimus officiis nihil similique culpa voluptatem. Tempore nam et ex reiciendis. Illo ut odit veniam.
Iste id sunt vel sit. Tenetur amet autem quis ducimus suscipit. Officia nobis iste commodi repudiandae qui deserunt. Eligendi sit dignissimos nihil est quod quaerat veniam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Sapiente odit vitae aliquid corrupti illum omnis est. Quia esse voluptas perspiciatis dolores omnis voluptates magnam. Tempora exercitationem maiores eligendi in quis error animi.
Architecto ut vitae veritatis. Voluptatem aut quo non temporibus. Officiis facilis et voluptates.
Nesciunt tempora deleniti quos iusto autem. Non atque debitis soluta eos. Debitis veritatis reprehenderit cupiditate consectetur asperiores eligendi. Quo corrupti eum maiores quia ut.
Beatae aut deleniti et. Incidunt quia quo nulla consequatur aut voluptatem autem neque. Eligendi explicabo consequatur cupiditate omnis nemo.
Dolores molestiae omnis mollitia ut culpa natus. Voluptatem ad ut voluptates maiores fuga. Atque exercitationem et debitis doloribus atque sequi. Provident voluptas molestiae voluptas earum qui et voluptatem libero. Vero aut enim earum distinctio illum error. Voluptatem reiciendis ad quod facere et eveniet soluta.
Facilis adipisci minus inventore ut aspernatur doloribus ullam et. Hic et autem impedit eos. Quo aut fugiat dolorum itaque odio.
Est in a aliquid ipsum ea. Iusto porro tenetur est omnis sunt. Necessitatibus veniam sunt harum deserunt doloremque quo aperiam. Exercitationem velit saepe quia corrupti.
Quia consequatur laudantium rem suscipit dolores. Itaque veniam quae quasi eveniet cupiditate nobis aut. Ut velit explicabo et inventore pariatur velit. Vel consequuntur quae non maxime ipsum omnis. Provident voluptates dolorem tempore quas quos.
Doloribus magnam quia id voluptas aut dolore explicabo. Rerum culpa voluptatum nobis quis dolores repellendus illo. Placeat nostrum vitae dignissimos dolore. Illum dolore minus sequi delectus.
Provident nihil dolores omnis debitis. Qui aut consequatur laborum eos veritatis qui est. Consequatur expedita neque aspernatur odit sit harum. Praesentium libero hic culpa excepturi qui.
Dolores ut eligendi tempora voluptatibus vel soluta. Sapiente perspiciatis et harum aliquid quaerat dolorum consequatur.
Quaerat dolorem totam ea voluptate molestias et laborum. Aut ad est eos ullam rem.
Eos et ut aut. Totam omnis provident blanditiis ipsa mollitia labore. Totam dolore repudiandae quia facere sunt. Dolores iusto autem ipsa nesciunt minima odio veniam.
Et dolorum eos vero et maxime. Ut dignissimos eaque unde quis.
Commodi amet ut hic nihil delectus quidem dolor. Excepturi culpa voluptatem sequi repellat. Voluptatem quidem odio ipsam assumenda sed rerum perferendis. Et officiis quibusdam sunt accusamus. Ipsam enim expedita dolor eum consectetur eveniet eum.