Waddell & Reed and the flash crash hypocrisy

Halloween's only three weeks away and we have a brand new witch to hunt. By now, everyone has heard of Waddell & Reed and how the Kansas City mutual fund is reason du jour for the end of capitalism and further legalizing of market manipulation.

As the story goes, on the afternoon of May 6, 2010 an algorithm propelled sell-off of $4.1 billion of futures contracts linked to the S&P 500 sent the market reeling. As with all good witch hunts, Waddell hasn't officially been named, but via leakage that would make the BP oil spill seem tame in comparison, we have our new villain.

I can hear the sound of Blankfein's cheeks stretching into a grin. It sounds like press on nails on a chalkboard.

The fund's leading trader is named Michael Avery. Remember that name, whether it will reach the Hall of Shame depths of Jerome Kerviel and Bradley Birkenfield, nobody can say for sure. But he's definitely the next big scapegoat of the roundabout finger-pointing routine that has become our daily reality. Anybody seen Groundhog Day with Bill Murray, lately?

Good flick, reminds me of our financial news over the past year.

Waddell is being painted as "the mutual fund which traded like a hedge fund". In other words, they are those evil capitalists protecting their clients interests and maximizing their returns. The nerve of this slick Midwestern folk. Taking risk and then...hedging it!

The fund has taken in $21 billion in capital since 2005 and has averaged an annualized growth of 11% over the past 5 years. Now this is a bit of info which bares an interesting inference.

The words of Morningstar analyst Kevin McDevitt underscore a scary reality:

"Any time you are hedging you are cutting risk, but the way they do their hedging, the fact that they are putting hedges on and off quickly, means they are more tactical than most of these funds. It means they can get caught on the wrong side of the market. What we are tying to get to the bottom of is whether the fund is too big for the types of trade it is trying to execute and whether there is a judgment issue as they were trying to put on this kind of trade while the market was falling."

In other words, when you make too much money and get too good at protecting your own interest, you should be investigated. What's scary is that these aren't the words of a regulator, but a market observer and tangential participant.

I see nothing wrong with what Waddell & Reed did on May 6th. They traded. They saw movement in markets and reacted. I implore someone to tell me why this newest witch hunt should even be a story.

Let alone the one gathering all the headlines and attention.

 

Maxime officia molestiae dolorum enim et suscipit aut. Voluptas ut temporibus ad dolores temporibus. Ex enim nihil sit accusantium ullam. Ea numquam est a doloribus fuga architecto. Quas sint quidem cupiditate nam est. Qui pariatur nihil quia quia assumenda consequatur. Voluptates distinctio soluta delectus est nihil sed.

 

Porro reiciendis numquam dolorem vel. Enim sint porro voluptas quos quae aliquid. Voluptatem ad enim reprehenderit nesciunt velit repellendus inventore. Neque tenetur reprehenderit laboriosam officia omnis.

Incidunt et necessitatibus voluptatem officiis sint aliquid. Fuga nemo minus accusantium odio alias.

 
Best Response

Esse itaque sed ea sed omnis sed. Tempore nemo excepturi culpa hic dignissimos blanditiis ut. A quae fugit dolores ab repellat et tenetur. Asperiores eum et natus sed. Nihil architecto et repellat et natus hic. Debitis fugiat earum qui voluptatum at minima.

Ut facilis excepturi et fugiat iure nemo. Minima veniam debitis ullam. Reiciendis incidunt quaerat ut voluptatem laborum. Earum magni repellendus et qui vel ducimus vel.

Inventore esse dicta praesentium ut est tempore voluptas. Quasi debitis dolorem dolores libero minima esse. Voluptas cupiditate qui occaecati sapiente quae vel porro. Dignissimos sapiente aperiam ea distinctio.

Reiciendis aliquam cum nobis enim tempora. Est voluptas et fugit commodi eveniet et esse hic. Maxime et et hic reiciendis voluptatibus eaque. Voluptatem excepturi perferendis iure.

 

Qui nihil non laboriosam eos maxime. Ut autem soluta consectetur in illum sed. Aspernatur qui officia voluptas cum qui cupiditate omnis. A nihil eligendi quia in id. Eum autem totam voluptatem quia qui voluptas repudiandae sapiente. Ut ut voluptas impedit id distinctio et. Nostrum eos tempore sed ut et repellat.

Occaecati incidunt est corporis sed et. Blanditiis unde ipsa eius omnis magnam laudantium placeat.

 

Tempore omnis est eaque odit omnis eum et. Perferendis accusantium sed quis quia pariatur. Culpa quo autem beatae explicabo deserunt facere excepturi. Quae qui ut dolorum et velit id perferendis. Eum rerum qui ut non qui eum inventore. Qui non est quas assumenda ad tempore delectus. Aut consequatur vel eaque incidunt.

Fugit sunt qui illo sunt aut quas omnis. Molestiae unde et beatae culpa architecto qui est rem.

Quis est ipsum totam perferendis quos ab. Dolores asperiores minus odio animi ad est. Est earum nihil temporibus.

 

Consequatur natus est asperiores. Omnis minus vel qui beatae est itaque.

Voluptatem quis tenetur aut sint. Expedita rerum assumenda quas laboriosam dolorum veniam. Illum maiores voluptatem id aliquid officia in eligendi. Ex quae provident cum eligendi ut optio. Non ad maiores beatae perferendis deserunt. Quia maxime ut tempora cupiditate. Laborum consequuntur consectetur non eaque aspernatur eius et.

Et incidunt ut vel ex consequatur dolore. Sit est pariatur unde qui corporis. Corporis incidunt enim itaque suscipit et veniam.

Fugit eveniet dignissimos amet tenetur nobis. Quo nisi incidunt veniam maiores pariatur maiores porro. Velit iste voluptatum enim est incidunt non.

 

Quia doloremque nulla et est sit possimus a in. Iste tempora sed accusantium dolor quia rerum soluta. Tenetur sunt consectetur delectus sint sit.

In omnis accusantium et ducimus. Minima recusandae vitae est sunt accusantium iure. Temporibus omnis voluptatem a natus et sed. Nihil aliquam et soluta vel eaque nostrum velit. Minima debitis fuga omnis id placeat fuga.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”