"Wait why did some humans have long hair and two big things near their armpits before the 22nd century?"
Topic at hand - Will the (future) widespread adoption of the artificial womb render women useless, resulting in a male-only society?
Girls will essentially be wallflowers. A few will be kept around in museums, etc. Patrons will gawk at them, and recall their importance throughout most of humanity.
(Think that today, everything can be done virtually, globally, within seconds. The only thing that actually requires face-to-face interaction is procreation.)
In 2400 or whatever, men will contribute money (or the future equivalent of wealth) to be granted access to a genetic database of available eggs. His sperm would already be in a database. Choose the girl he thinks is beautiful, and voila, your baby will begin contruction ("growing") in a laboratory. Pick up in 8 months, free shipping optional.
Most people would choose males, given the uselessness of having a 50/50 gender ratio in society. Corporations may create females to serve as museum displays, escorts, or otherwise visual eye-candy. Or, they may purposely select for characteristcs that allow for manual labour, etc.
Continuing my thought, this means that ugly women will be SOL (so out of luck). Said another way, humans will literally be perfect specimens. (not sure this is beneficial, as you need ugly to have pretty).
The technology WILL work on humans (confirmed). However, you know ethicists are all up in arms.
Your thoughts?
Goddamn. I shouldn't bite on this... as if most men want women around solely to bear their children. Sure gene survival and all, but even if that has been secured by alternative means, it's not like men will cease fucking women. Come on man, this is bad even for you.
had an interesting debate with a friend over this.
so in essence, is the question of whether men are inherently hedonists or pragmatists. if we are the former, then yes, men would not "cease fucking women" as you suggested.
BUT, if we're pragmatists, then women would slowly cease to have a function.
What makes you think men would be anything other than hedonists? Countless men--myself included--have basically ruined their lives over vagina. Wonderful, wonderful vagina...
Not biting on this one, lol.. What a joke
This exact post has been on this website before. Quit fucking just copy and pasting previous posts.
it's unfortunate that I don't peruse old posts.
just because a man is incapable of his own ideas, doesn't mean he should make accusatory statements of "idea plagiarism" towards others.
I don't give a fuck about plagiarism, i give a fuck about douchebags who can't use the search function.
This guy is a strange dude, look at his past posts and you can tell he probably hasn't texted a girl before considering the shit he goes on about
I like women for their incredible bodies. In fact, them not bearing children will make them even more attractive to me.
that's your rational brain trying to justify your reptilian brain.
the truth of the matter is, you're on this planet at the behest of your genes. nothing more.
you're autistic as fuck. get smart, dummy
Why would single men choose to have children? The future sounds awful.
Quod quod et quia est quia corrupti. Laborum et voluptas quia aliquid. Iusto sunt at enim vel assumenda. Nesciunt necessitatibus at nihil incidunt possimus consequatur nihil. Fugiat modi autem sint velit amet deleniti ullam. Autem ullam et sint qui quaerat sapiente sint illo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...