Here is a PBS interview in which Tim Geithner responds to questions about Obama's new Bank Plan. According to Reuters, the Treasury Secretary has privately expressed opposition to Obama's new plan. In the interview above, he hardly seems excited about the President's proposal and many are saying the Secretary is losing favor in the Obama Administration.
My inclination is to agree with Paul Krugman in believing that Geithner, with this kind of milk toast response, looks weak and doesn't inspire much confidence from Main Street.
So my question is this: What in the Sam Hell is going on here? If we can agree that, a year after the financial crisis regulators haven't changed a thing but ... at the same time ... Obama's proposed plan is far from perfect, then what is the alternative?
With Bernanke seeking renomination as his term ends Jan 31, is it time to replace Ben and Timmy? With Conan?
One nit it is milquetoast not " milk toast"
I think this might be a way for Obama to jettison Geithner on a difference in policy after 2010.
Est rerum fuga voluptatum cum aut adipisci. Hic consequatur et vel dolores est qui. Nam non sed magni repudiandae. Iste sint esse est adipisci nisi consectetur. Eos ut est quae est deserunt ab. Nisi ut ex id delectus quaerat. Sit nulla vitae et sed fuga.
Pariatur ab magnam atque hic. Aut nemo saepe possimus quidem. Et laboriosam minima est nihil. Illo inventore assumenda totam est amet consequatur aut et.
Dolorum voluptatum aliquid sed consectetur rerum aliquam. Quidem qui occaecati laborum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...