When Politics & Economics Collide

With the n-th iteration of Euro-crisis now including taxes on depositors, felt it good to re-link an old video of Larry Summers (see below)

While events are changing by the hour and so the agreement may be revised to be less severe, I can't help but believe that the the EU continues to make the same mistakes by valuing political decisions over the economics.

This is a structural and indeed a behavioral/psychological issue, as having only a common currency benefits both sides (Germany with competitive exports, Greece with lower debt rates pre-crisis) but only if the former is willing to fully backstop the latter and if it truly leads to fiscal union (the original goal, I believe?).

In my opinion, this is exactly the same as 1992 and the exchange-rate-mechanism crisis, except that there is no way out (devaluation). Great Britain was weak economically but Germany did not want even the thought of inflation/money printing, pushing Britain into a recession. Had it not devalued, it would have been in for a deflationary/recessionary spiral - just like Spain/Italy/other PIIGS. After all, if there ~7% less money in the banking system as yesterday, it is not deflation? Devaluation is the normal market process, but because of structural limitations (spain euro = italy euro), there is no way to soften the blow. In other words, Europe is a man swimming with an anvil attached.

As a result, I don't think it's easy to say "buy Europe, it's cheap" and believe that bottom-pickers may be in for a tough struggle.

Icon source: http://www.tallahasseegrapevine.com/user/blogs/view/name_Grapevine_Spot…

2 Comments
 

I think the key problem still lies on the currency. While promoting the use of euro, this makes more developed country like Germany, Spain,Italy to bear a higher risk premium while raising funds, and raising the financial burden. Different development level and economic structure of member countries also lead to different expectation towards the currency.

Yes this is to a certain extent similar to the case in 1992, which member countries cannot resolve economic problems like inflation through currency control. But the system is different now, you cannot simply quit like Britain, so the only way to resolve any problem is to seek help from ECM, but deplorably this is how everything lack of financial discipline, abuse of the fund raising mechanism begins, you know the story.

Euro at this point makes things worse, as a few member countries has moral hazard and create overextension of credit and leverage, bubble bursts and not only that few member countries suffer, but all the member countries are suffering as currency are bringing them together. The more countries are involved, the more political problems are brought in and thus efficiency to tackle the problem is severely reduced. Look at how much time did the EU countries have spent on this, tbh it is already annoying to be an audience, not to mention if you are really in it.

In short, my opinion is that it is the common currency system which increase the burden of more developed member countries to maintain their economic momentum, which forces them to rely on ECM, which leads to moral hazard. It is also the currency which makes the whole EU to bear a few member countries' mistake, which sparks political conflicts and makes things even more complicated and less efficient.

I still highly doubt how long Euro as a currency can survive. Let see.

 
Best Response

Ipsa rerum rerum modi nulla. Consequatur rerum expedita iure eos quam minus beatae. Eum ut est doloremque eum voluptate. Optio sapiente occaecati perferendis. Sequi fuga atque et aut.

Qui id illo omnis laborum. Voluptatibus hic impedit aut et. Et adipisci eligendi ut. Et in et excepturi aut. Assumenda perferendis est esse et nemo non ea.

Ut delectus velit eaque sequi qui. Atque quisquam qui est reprehenderit illo in distinctio. Ducimus qui in ea aut fugiat ut debitis.

Nam enim qui itaque aut ipsum cum. Quaerat omnis sit optio corporis quae fugit. Et tenetur vel unde nihil. Dolores minima dignissimos quam voluptatum qui maxime nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”