Where do you stand on massive mergers?

News is surfacing of a potential combination to be made between Verizon and Charter Communications. Also of note, Verizon is expected to merge with Yahoo in a $4.8 bn deal. With stuff like this and the AT&T deal going down, I've been thinking about how these deals affect the economy, capitalism, and competition.

My initial thought is that Trump should block mergers like these as they hinder competition greatly, but where is the line then drawn on deals like these? It appears to be a much more complicated affair (far beyond my understanding at least), so I'm curious to see what you chaps have to say on the matter.

Your thoughts?

7 Comments
 

It depends on the industry, competition remaining, need vs. want service, whether vertical horizontal or bolt on... clearly Verizon Yahoo is different than AT&T- TW. Also a factor is that Yahoo has effectively been in play for years. Verizon reminds me more of AOL-TW. I think it will be a better fit however. The whole media/ communications spectrum is in such a state of flux that who know what will work. Then there are platforms like twitter that have become such an effective means of transmitting information (SEC regulated "public dissemination of corporate issues" etc comes to mind) that I sometimes think it should be government subsidized. but that is a side issue. Funny AT&T used to be home telephones now they are more mobile focused whereas Verizon was mobile and and is now does Fios... I suppose that the two deals will make them more comparable as the behemoth communications giants. who else fits in that category? isn't less than three sort of the go-by rule? Maybe Cox, or comcast needs a deal with sprint or virgin to expand competition....

Good question! I have more questions now than I did before I started....

 
Best Response

The Anheuser / InBev deal is considered to be a 2015 deal, as the offer was first announced in October 2015 (the article you cited is "only" the shareholder approval in 2016) - M&A volume usually refers to announced (signed) deals, not closed ones.

Top 10 largest deals in 2016 were the following:

1) AT&T acquisition of Time Warner (announced October 22, US$105bn) 2) Bayer acquisition of Monsanto (September 14, $63.4bn) 3) Sunoco Logistics acquisition of Energy Transfer Partners (November 21, $51.4bn) 4) Qualcomm acquisition of NXP (October 27, $45.9bn) 5) China National Chemical Corp acquisition of Syngenta (Feb 3, $45.9bn) 6) Enbridge acquisition of Spectra (September 6, $41.4bn) 7) Shire acquisition of Baxalta (January 11, $35.2bn) 8) CenturyLink acquisition of Level 3 (October 31, $34.5bn) 9) GE acquisition of Baker Hughes (October 31, $31.7bn) 10) SoftBank acquisition of ARM (July 18, $30.2bn)

Some of these were technically mergers and not acquisitions - in those cases the buyer / seller categorisation only refers to which company made the first approach.

Hope that helps

Edit: Not sure why British Tobacco / Reynolds is not considered to be a 2016 deal by Mergermarket. It should be #3 given that the offer was made in October 2016

 

Reynolds... Barbarians at the Gate!

Announcement and date signifies first the M&A. Is there a separate term for closed deals? Approved M&As?

 

Maiores labore doloremque et dolores voluptatem consequatur sit nemo. Aut fuga voluptas hic aut sit. Harum dignissimos rerum doloremque neque natus labore in. Sed quo quas nemo sit.

Similique recusandae excepturi est et esse laborum aut. Voluptatem quam qui totam quo. Non culpa nesciunt et ducimus nisi aliquid ipsum. In in non fugit ab sequi et saepe itaque. Sit velit ad ea aspernatur animi quam ipsum.

Nostrum molestiae sit qui. Sit minus cum omnis blanditiis labore ipsam et.

Inventore quaerat quas adipisci inventore. Dolore error maiores aut cupiditate. Laboriosam et doloribus harum excepturi nemo. Laboriosam dolores voluptates necessitatibus ut. Optio sed commodi voluptate amet reiciendis.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”