WSJ - IRS Urged to Focus Audits on Wealthiest

From the WSJ (link inside the post):

"Tax agency spends too much effort on people who make $200,000 to $400,000 and too little on wealthiest Americans, report says.."

"In fiscal 2014, the IRS audited 1.5% of tax returns for people with incomes between $200,000 and $400,000, and 12.1% of returns for filers with incomes above $5 million."

"But the tippy-top is where the money is. An auditor working those lower-dollar cases recommends $605 in additional taxes per hour, while one working on a $5 million return will find $4,545 per hour, according to the inspector general’s report."

Thoughts?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/irs-urged-to-focus-audits-on-wealthiest-144…

16 Comments
 
Best Response

Why don't they just go a step further and have the government actually fill out your tax returns out for you if you make above $5-10 million? If you go that far, you might as well make it for anyone who makes above $100K. But then, I suppose a lot of people would show income of $99K, so we might as well just have the IRS fill out the forms for everyone. It's much easier that way and we don't want anyone making mistakes.

Big brother is watching....

 
"undefined"

Here's a question...why not hire the amount of auditors necessary to screen everyone, if even the lower dollar cases are generating 605/hour...? I assume the pay is between ~20-50 an hour...What am i missing?

True but my guess is there must be a point of diminishing returns, although from what understand of how poorly funded the IRS is, I doubt we've reached it.
 
GREG: Illegal? No, Seth. Everyone does that shit. Even on Wall Street. And John over there, he works for us. He's a fucking chimp. The only compliance work he's doing is making sure my lunch is still hot when it gets here. He's only here because the SEC requires it. He might have the easiest fucking job in the entire world. Look at him I think he's actually masturbating right now.
WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.
 

Not exactly sure why this is getting so much hate. Pretty sound policy approach. Taxes suck and there's definitely a conversation to be had about reducing spending and reducing taxes, but that doesn't mean wealthier people with better access to accountants/lawyers can knowingly break the law. Pretty sure there was a Freakonomics thing about how even a slight increase in audits across the board greatly increases tax revenue since people stop under-reporting income out of fear.

 

I think there is the misunderstanding that taxes are simple once you make above a certain $$ amount. The reasoning the IRS is discussing this change in tax strategy, is due to the grey areas of the tax code that can only be accessed by those high income earners. (they also pay for very good accountants and lawyers). Similarly, as in finance you make assumptions, there "interpretations" of the law. The private sector applies the law as they understand (obviously to their benefit), meanwhile an auditor may interpret it differently. The displeasure comes when the taxpayer has been sold by an accountant the idea of saving money on taxes only to realize years later the government disagrees with what was done. Hence, very upset taxpayer who blames the IRS, not the accountant.

 

Iste et blanditiis placeat. Temporibus alias quos optio molestias fugit voluptatem dignissimos. Recusandae velit quis nam inventore veritatis neque. Ea deleniti perspiciatis incidunt. Quaerat voluptas recusandae voluptatibus. Est temporibus est vero harum dolorem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 11 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”