Basic accounting question in depth
Hi all, I'm struggling to understand this and would appreciate any help on the impact of an increase in Interest expense by $10.
1. Pre tax income falls by $10, assuming 40% tax rate, Net income falls by $6.
2. CFS: Net income at top of CFO falls by $6, and since there are no other changes, cash is down by $6.
3. BS: Assets is down by $6 due to fall in cash; Liabilities no change; SE is down by $6 due to fall in net income. Both sides balance.
My challenge in understanding is here: If interest expense is a cash outflow ($10), why am I only seeing a ($6) impact on CFS? It would work out well if the tax rate was 0%. I am not sure how the tax is impacting this $10 interest expense payment. Appreciate any help, thanks in advance
Assume taxable income is $100 and tax rate is 40%.
With no interest: 100 x 40%=40 paid in taxes 100-40=60 net income.
With $10 of interest: 90 x 40%=36 paid in taxes 90-36=54 net income.
With the interest taxable income decreased by 10 but net income only decreased by 6 because of the tax shield.
Thank you i think this helped.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's the breakdown of your question:
Understanding the Tax Impact on Interest Expense:
Cash Flow Statement (CFS) Explanation:
Why the Cash Outflow Isn't $10 on the CFS:
Balance Sheet (BS) Alignment:
In summary, the tax shield reduces the effective cash outflow from the interest expense, which is why the impact on the CFS is $6 instead of $10. This is a fundamental concept in accounting and finance, as taxes play a significant role in determining the net cash impact of expenses.
Sources: Difficult Accounting Technical - IBD, 21 Finance Interview Questions and Answers, 1st Yr Banking Analyst Open for Questions, DCF Modeling Course ~ Pre-training text.pdf, Investment Banking Interview Questions - 15 Answers to Land the Job
From a FS preparer's pov, an expense isn't always an outflow. When you prepare the CFS using an indirect method (the most common method), you have to put a footnote that explicitly states cash paid for taxes and cash paid for interest, both of which can be different than tax and interest expense. A lot of times a company will book interest expense against a liability like accrued interest instead of directly reducing cash.
In your example, you are seeing a difference because the reduction in tax expense of $4 is added back to Net Income at the same time as the $10 from the income expense is being netted out giving you a net change of $6.
Excellent analysis! The confusion is common; keep in mind that taxes *save* you \$4, so the net cash impact is \$6. The full \$10 interest is a cash outflow.
Et sint reprehenderit quasi hic. Fugit voluptatem quo ea neque eaque enim voluptas. Omnis perspiciatis eum cupiditate quo.
Nemo voluptas provident eveniet explicabo ea doloremque modi. Placeat ea ut ut. Minus aut fuga mollitia sit ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...