Apax Vs CD&R vs LGP
Which one would you personally take an offer out of Apax, CD&R and Leonard Green Partners? This is for senior aso position.
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
November 30, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
Assuming this is for the US, I would toss Apax out of the mix and decide between CD&R and LGP based on your location preference. If location agnostic, LGP seems more chill but CD&R is better performing (though splitting hairs) at the cost of having a very uptight / old school culture
Leonard Green or CD&R without a doubt. They are both top caliber firms, but with different investment styles. Leonard Green has a growth orientation with a willingness to pay higher multiples for quality businesses and management teams. From what I understand, CD&R takes a more classic operational approach to value creation with focuses on M&A and margin expansion. They compete with the traditional MF PE firms on both deals and talent. I’m sure pay is on par with MF PE as well. It does seem like they have widely differing cultures and that’s apparent just from looking at their websites.
CD&R's bread and butter is A+B deals. Great performance. Associates are very busy.
A+B?
Apax most fun
CD&R best performance
LGP best location
Apax certainly isn't most fun
CD&R places no value on EQ. Apax has a more 'fun' investment style. Obviously neither job is fun.
Thank you everyone for the help. I am curious why people are disregarding Apax?
I have no strong ties but like living in NYC and between CDR vs Apax was leaning towards Apax given it seemed to have a more interesting investment style vs CDR.
If Apax is significantly behind the other two, will definitely reconsider. I spent the last couple of years in a MM fund so don't understand the MF landscape very well
Apax is not behind the two, they are just global so the perception in the US is a bit diluted (so in the US your brand name is hurt but the firm itself is more dominant on a global basis)
I would go CD&R > Apax > Leonard Green (focusing on actual performance, fund size, and preference for NYC)
Can I PM you? Going through a similar process right now
bump
Bump
Apax and CD&R are both highly operationally focused but in entirely different ways from the outside
-CD&R tries to implement M&A driven synergies to kill costs
-Apax tries to maximize operational efficiency and value creation along the supply chain to kill costs.
Both implement financial engineering to improve performance and valuation.
Not familiar w Leonard Green but they're a Cali shop if that's your cup of tea and I would say prestige wise not at par with the other two (brand name prestige not fund size)
Would go between Apax and CD&R here. Edge to Apax if interested in tech/disruption, edge to CD&R if interested in finance/value.
Both are in the middle of very successful raises (10bn+ each already, which is no easy task in today's environment).
I think LGP is being slept on. Top tier fund with a good culture and nice strategy (high quality growing businesses). They pay top if street and if you like LA quality of life is great. Honestly all three great choices
Completely agree with LGP being a quality shop but to that point all 3 are extremely high quality shops, it’s really more about location/vertical/etc that someone prefers
Bump
Expedita nobis ratione maiores harum rem voluptatem. Est accusamus pariatur qui dolorum debitis quisquam molestias. Illum vel laudantium voluptatibus quia. Sed sed et odit nihil. Et dignissimos deserunt est id harum. Qui cumque et rerum debitis.
Laudantium deleniti mollitia consequatur cumque deserunt accusamus harum. Et aut enim nihil quo non qui. Aliquam eveniet facere illo iusto. Sunt enim qui sit enim harum.
Occaecati sint quia neque autem non. Omnis velit ut aliquid inventore. Enim eos et iusto totam et error.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...