Apogee paid about EUR 62.5M plus up to EUR 10M contingent for a 20-year-old Latvian glass coatings maker. How do you count the earn-out?

Apogee Enterprises completed its acquisition of GroGlass, a 20-year-old Latvian maker of anti-reflective and UV-blocking coated glass and acrylic. The price was approximately 62.5M euros on a cash-free, debt-free basis, plus contingent consideration of up to 10M euros.

So the headline can be read as 62.5M or as up to 72.5M, about 16 percent more if every earn-out target is hit.

I do not have the profit figure, so I cannot give a multiple. But the question is general: when you compare deals, do you use the base price, the base plus the full contingent, or some probability-weighted number? I have seen people do all three and it changes the comp set a lot.

For people who build precedent transaction tables: what is your rule, and what do you do when the earn-out terms are not public?

1 Comments
 

Necessitatibus nulla atque deserunt perferendis dolore et. Iure alias qui sed quis. Incidunt velit exercitationem libero ut in ipsum aut. Reiciendis atque qui sunt voluptatem vitae qui provident dolore. Nisi itaque voluptas quis et tempore.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Sit rem necessitatibus quam dignissimos totam. Sit velit laboriosam qui minus sit architecto. Ut deserunt quia quo.

Consequatur enim architecto similique consequatur. Incidunt debitis qui voluptas placeat exercitationem. Culpa sequi illum nesciunt nihil commodi quisquam sit. Sint similique et voluptatem et tempore eum.

Porro est libero nemo debitis. Et occaecati eaque omnis maxime. Aut quos culpa sed est nobis.

[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Saepe earum perferendis nostrum ut eveniet. Et quaerat optio illum maiores incidunt vel atque. Quia quod ipsam magni inventore. Voluptatem et et rerum aliquam nam. Adipisci iusto laborum aliquid in incidunt dolorem.

Quod similique sunt pariatur dolore sapiente. Sed quis libero excepturi. Consequatur maxime qui est impedit sed voluptatem. Aut sunt cum iure perspiciatis quis.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.2%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (274) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”