Burnt out and looking for what’s next

Ignore the title, but I’m an SA and I’m up for VP soon, and I really don’t want it. This job has absolutely crushed me for as long as I’ve been in PE. It doesn’t really get better until you’re a senior MD.

I’ve already been doing a lot of the VP role, and I’m finding the “quarterbacking” boring and kind of micromanage-y, although that might just be the nature of how my firm invests.

I’m trying to figure out what the next step is for me. I’m still okay with grinding, I just can’t do another 4–9 months of DD sprints trying to close a deal. It’s exhausting, and honestly pretty boring when so much of it is admin and process work. I’ve always found business diligence way more interesting.

I’m thinking about moving to growth (Series B+) or a hedge fund (SM), but I don’t know if those are actually much better. I also don’t want to keep trying things just to learn I don’t like them either. I told about corp dev but I think it’s too boring for me and the comp is too low. And honestly, I’m getting older and want a job that can pay me a shit ton on money, still interesting, but prevents me from having to consistently work 80+ hours a week, so I can spend more time with my friends, family, relationship, future kids and my personal heslth. 

18 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, your situation is not uncommon, and many professionals in PE face similar crossroads. Here are some actionable insights and potential paths to consider:

1. Growth Equity (Series B+):

  • Pros: Growth equity often involves less intense deal timelines compared to traditional PE. The focus on scaling businesses rather than heavy operational turnarounds or distressed assets can be more intellectually stimulating, especially if you enjoy business diligence.
  • Cons: While the hours may be slightly better, it’s still a grind, especially at larger funds. The work-life balance might not drastically improve unless you target smaller or niche growth equity shops.

2. Hedge Funds (SM):

  • Pros: Single-manager hedge funds can offer a more dynamic and market-driven environment. If you enjoy analyzing businesses and making investment decisions without the administrative burden of deal processes, this could be a good fit.
  • Cons: Hedge funds can be high-pressure environments, and comp is often tied to fund performance. The hours can still be demanding, especially during earnings seasons or market volatility.

3. Corporate Development:

  • Pros: Corp Dev roles typically offer better work-life balance, with more predictable hours and less travel. You’ll still be involved in M&A, but the pace is slower, and the focus is on strategic fit rather than deal volume.
  • Cons: As you mentioned, comp is generally lower than PE, and the work might feel less dynamic or challenging if you thrive on high-stakes environments.

4. Family Offices or Smaller Funds:

  • Pros: Family offices or smaller PE funds (sub-$500M AUM) often have a more relaxed culture and better work-life balance. The deal flow is slower, and the focus is often on long-term investments rather than quick exits.
  • Cons: Smaller funds may not offer the same level of comp or prestige as larger PE shops.

5. Downmarket Funds or Niche Roles:

  • Pros: Moving to a downmarket fund or a niche role (e.g., sector-specific funds) can provide a more balanced lifestyle. These roles often have less competitive deal processes and a more collaborative culture.
  • Cons: The hours might still be long during active deals, but the overall intensity is usually lower.

6. Consider Your Priorities:

  • If comp is a top priority, staying in finance (growth equity, hedge funds, or smaller PE funds) is likely your best bet.
  • If work-life balance and personal time are more important, exploring roles like Corp Dev, family offices, or even transitioning to a strategic role in a portfolio company could be worth considering.

7. Next Steps:

  • Network: Leverage your existing network to have candid conversations with professionals in growth equity, hedge funds, and other areas you’re considering. An MBA network (if applicable) can also be a valuable resource.
  • Test the Waters: If possible, take informational interviews or short-term projects to get a feel for the work in these fields before making a full transition.
  • Reflect: Take some time to evaluate what aspects of your current role you enjoy and what you want to avoid in your next step. This clarity will help you make a more informed decision.

Ultimately, there’s no perfect role, but aligning your career with your personal priorities—whether it’s comp, intellectual stimulation, or work-life balance—will help you find a path that’s more sustainable and fulfilling.

Sources: Handling Stress / Burnout in Private Equity, Private Equity shops with the best work/life balance, The PE career path, Just got laid off from my 3rd PE job in 4 years - help!

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Maybe. I never really liked the spray and pray style and the comp is also low. Why not growth/VC at series B or C+? Are funds like IVP, NEA, Insight, Greenoaks, Bond, TCV, Iconiq, General Catalyst, etc. sweaty?  Please tell me there’s a world where I’m working only 60-70 hours max, have most weekends free, don’t get grinded on most holidays and still make a lot of money lol. I feel like these request seem like a lot but when I step back, this should be the bare minimum 

 

How would you view a career in secondaries vs buyout? Feels like secondaries has lower ceiling but more growth opps?

 

I feel like your thinking it correct. Lots of capital flowing into secondaries, so lots of deal reps if you find a good shop. If you find the right career track role, I think there is still solid upside in the space (lesser ceiling than buyout though almost certainly). I do think if you don't like secondaries, your exit options are far more limited than doing buyout, at least from what I've seen. Maybe others can chime in if they've had a different experience.

 

Currently a third year analyst going through secondaries off cycle. What are some of these grindy, hardo, secondaries shops that we should avoid?

 

Can only speak from personal experience so unfortunately can't give you a comprehensive list of firms. Just a few initial things to think about when evaluating potential grindy shops:

  • Deals evaluated per quarter: Obviously more deal experience is better, but running at every deal that hits your desk to generate a high volume of LOIs but low volume of closes results in a potentially endless stream of deal sprints.
  • Fund size vs. the opportunity set: If you have an undersized fund vs. your pipeline, particularly on the CV side, it might result in significant co-invest generation. Which is great from a GP franchise-building perspective, but as a deal execution person, running both the transaction itself and the co-investment process can be a nightmare in terms of expected deliverables and availability.
  • Does the firm love to 'hang around the hoop'? If yes, very rarely does anything in your pipeline ever die, and your nights or weekends can be imploded by zombie deals you thought were dead months ago.
  • Is there a functioning middle office? Larger firms will win out here obviously. If your day job is underwriting and second day job is more or less being an IR person, it adds up.
  • Deal team leads: Really vet who you are working for (VPs, partners, etc.). Try to get a feel for their expectations of junior and mid-level people in your prospective roles. In my experience, some senior people feel slighted about the perception that secondaries is 'lazier' than PE and will implement a culture that adjusts for that accordingly.
  • Deliverables: Do deal teams push out 30+ page memos for all deals discussed at IC? Imo this can be an extreme amount of volume at a secondaries shop and some do have this expectation.

My perspective might be jaded as I get older and lose energy/run out of patience. I will say that the above mostly pertains to smaller shops rather than large cap shops, so a lot of this might not be relevant for you. I hope your processes go well.

 

What are you solving for beyond being burned out? Work product quality, friendlier colleagues, fewer hours, more predictable hours, more flexibility, more ability to take vacations? How much does comp matter to you? How much does career progression matter to you? How much does working as an “investor” and thinking like an investor matter to you vs doing project based work? There are layers to this that if you unpack will give you a lot of clarity. 

 

Never ceases to amaze me how private equity provides you with the best business training possible yet few people think about starting/buying a business.

Figure out what you are solving for but the economic upside and freedom most people is not in climbing the corporate ladder at a PE fund. (Yes PE is just a very well paid corporate job now)

 

Dolore soluta sed nostrum voluptate quis soluta. Dolore ut nam temporibus. Laboriosam quas nihil iusto quos sunt vitae voluptas.

Quas molestias ut officia tenetur ducimus neque. Perferendis ut totam ea reiciendis fuga nihil nisi. Eum repudiandae ipsam voluptas ipsam voluptas reprehenderit repudiandae. Ex quibusdam pariatur ea iusto veniam voluptate.

Molestiae quas vero expedita et et. Quisquam id molestias consequuntur. Occaecati exercitationem delectus maiores architecto qui aut quae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (352) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”