Criteria for evaluating PE investments - need help

Hi all,

I am prepping for an interview in a middle market PE. I have no PE experience and I am working through the LBO modeling as we speak. However,

Can anyone tell me what one looks for in determining whether to invest in a private company. I am thinking that the criteria must be along the lines of:

  • Strong management that is financially invested into the company
  • Sales growth used to forecast operating cash flow
  • The IRR of the investment must meet the objective of the PE firm
  • Exit Opps
  • Company is willing to work with PE to grow rapidly?

Any help is much appreciated.

Thanks

 

Each shop has its own criteria but here are our main ones, the actual list is pretty long. Keep in mind that these are relatively flexible and in no particular order:

*Many firms have a minimum trailing EBITDA (ours is $2.5M) *3-5 years cash flow positive *Fragmented industry *Ability to leverage the PE team's expertise *Strong management team *Large debt capacity (lots of collateral) *Potential for organic and acquisition driven growth

You don't necessarily need/want a management team that is financially tied to the company. Remember that any equity you give the management is money that is not coming back to the firm.

These also may change depending on the size of transactions the PE firm runs down. My experience is in middle market.

 

 A talented and committed management team, with meaningful financial participation and a successful track record;  A market leader with a defensible position;  A diversified customer base;  An appealing range of products and wide distribution channels;  Participation in a growing market;  Product lines with extended life cycles and low obsolescence risks; and  Sustainable operating profit margins of ten percent or higher.

 
Best Response

For larger MM investments collateral is less relevant to debt capacity, since leverage is driven more by cash flow than underlying assets (collateral would primarily be of concern to only the most senior lenders). That being said, PE firms tend to place value on those dynamics that translate EBITDA into free cash flow. A number of items can drive the EBITDA-to-FCF variance, but two of the most common would be the amount of working capital and level of capital expenditures required to run / grow the business (of course, for both items lower is better).

 

Hey guys,

Thanks for the responses

So initially I would be looking at sales. Why do I care about EBITDA at the beginning versus say their free cash flow in order to see that they are profitible to the point that they have positive net after operations, investments and financings. Do I care to see free cash flow or is this something i would fix as a PE firm.

At the same time I am evaluating management, the market, their market shares, making sure they have sustainable sales growth potential, solid customer base, brand recognition and 3-4 years of positive free cash flow. So assuming that I like what I see up to this point...what is the next step.

I assume that there is some min. return on on investment that any PE firm looks for when getting involved with a company. At this point would I build up a model to forecast the EBITDA over the length of the holding? I am thinking at this point, the drivers for the model would be based on the industry experience of the professionals at the PE firm. For example - the firm may know that they can reduce cap ex and change the working capital while still growing the business at some predetermined rate (based on their experience) to yeild greater FCF.

So based on experience, the firm might determine to recapitalize the company they are evaluating and take on more debt. In such a case, would I ultimately be looking for the ending equity value of my share so that I could discount it back at a rate of return that I am seeking to determine how much to pay for the equity shares in the company today.

How does the analysis change if i am considering PIPE financing, LBO, MBO, growth capital e.t.c.

Thanks for all your help.

 

Laboriosam est eos ut ullam voluptatem. Repudiandae ad neque assumenda corrupti dolores est magnam. Rerum vel molestias esse. Nobis laborum sunt eum assumenda tempora inventore. Aut rerum maxime rerum est. Quas autem voluptatum et velit assumenda harum dignissimos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”