Deciphering fund raise history (confusion on terms)

Hello all,

I am trying to understand the terms for a project (but being new and dipped in folly am unable to get it)

Fundraise history for an early stage start up as follows:

May 2013: $1mn seed round at $3mn pre money
Jan 2015: $700k round as convertible note at $10mn pre money cap and 20 percent discount

Jan 2019: Start up now looking to raise $3mn at
$15mn pre money valuation.

My doubts: To analyze this, does the Jan 2019 15mn pre money valuation include also the convertible debt? How does it work? What will be the final cap table? I don't understand how to calculate this without knowing the amount of shares outstanding...

 
Most Helpful

No details on the interest etc. but anyways...

The conv note will convert into equity, but there are nuances.

The Jan 2015 cap is $10m. But the Jan 2019 premoney valuation - the discount: $15m * (1-20%) = $12m.

So you ignore the discount since $12m > $10m.

Thus the equity share of the conv. note at conversion is $700k/$10m = 7%.

But this conversion comes at the Jan 2019 round.

So how does the final cap table work out:

May 2013. $1m at $3m pre = $4m post. Seed investor(s) has 25%, Founders have 75%.

Jan 2015 round. No change in cap table as the conv. note hasn't converted.

Jan 2019 round. Let's call this Series A. $3m at $15m pre = $18m post. Series A investors will have 16.7%. But we add the convertible note dilution. So the total dilution is 16.7% + 7% = 23.7%.

So on a fully diluted basis:

Founders: 75% * (1-23.7%) = 57.2%. Seed investors: 25% * (1-23.7%) = 19.1%. Conv note investors: 7%. Series A investors: 16.7%.

Sum: 100%

 

Thanks for the clear breakdown. Just for curiosity's sake, would any of the calculations change if you included interest but assumed no amort?

Edit: Sorry, just saw you answered this below.

Array
 

Wow great explanations. Would you be able to explain how these would change if the Series A had a full ratchet provision?

run-rate pro-forma illustrative adjusted normalized management EBITDA
 

Porro voluptates voluptatem impedit. Voluptas necessitatibus neque nihil nam reiciendis. Et non iure illum magni quisquam quibusdam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”