Fable 5 --> any opinions?
been trying to use Claude more for diligence, memo work, some light excel / model work, like auditing formulas etc but want to see how everyone else is using it?
has Fable 5 been a game changer in anyway and can you share any ideas how i can improve my own AI game?
Fable 5 is very good, has saved me a ton of time in diligence, doc review, portco monitoring.
What are your prompts ?
I don’t use prompts much anymore, for a lot of the tasks, I’ve basically compiled instructions and told Fable to make a skill. I have a skill called market structure and it goes through a checklist of questions or one for pricing power. It gives me a detailed output that i can read. Then i upload all the markdown files and use another skill called initial email template which formats the information from various skills into my normal first email template. Setting this up took a weekend the first time and then it’s been refined over time.
For data cuts / charts, i have a standard dashboard skill. I refined that skill using another skill that was made from a textbook on graphical presentations + our internal formatting preferences.
can i buy these off you please
No. Enjoy the underclass.
These are relatively simple to build if you spend an hour asking Claude to walk you through it
My answer isn’t related to the Anthropic’s Fable 5 itself but I find it interesting how much federal oversight is in these massive AI corporations for example I recommend researching EO 14409
Incredible. I'm a founder and use it to code, and it understands long-term thinking way better than Opus while also picking up on things I would've had to specify a few months ago. ALthough this is after ~6 months of creating a dev process and automating everything together so I just tell it what I want and it implements the features (full issue -> PR for any devs out there). Pretty cool stuff.
As a PE professional, you don't really need Fable and for pure workflow optimization, you really only need Sonnet Max. Using Opus to make dashboards and data cuts is kind of silly. But hey, it's not my usage.
Care to elaborate on your workflow optimization?
For software and creative work, it's game changing.
@Ozymandia @IsItREPE getting destroyed everyday.
I don't know a single person who uses it.
As with everything about AI, you make a claim and expect people to swallow it whole
Why do you keep tagging me in this stupidity?
And AI isn’t creative. It’s all slop stolen from the intellectual property of actually creative people.
It's stolen work, repackaged into sloppy hallucinations.
This moron's only point is that it is revolutionizing software coding (which, it isn't). Which makes it about as "revolutionary" as the handheld calculator, and that's the best case scenario!
Usage limit is pretty tight. It’s great but given how tight usage is you’re better off running on Opus 4.8
What effort level do you use. this is only an issue for me on Ultramax
Do skills really repeatedly work for you guys? I feel like I need to constantly remind it of even simple instructions within a skill (stuff that id think would be as easy to remember as brevity/length of a memo section). Then I hear a few folks say they are automating a ton of stuff with skills but that just does not line up with what I see in practice. I end up having to remind it of instructions embedded within the skill every couple requests. User error on my part? People stretching the truth on their part?
Probably some user error in prompting, but also it depends on what you're working on. Some stuff is rules based, formulaic, and automation is definitely a time saver. Other things are more nuanced.
Make sure you’re refreshing your context window. If it gets to the point where you need to be reminding it of anything, you should’ve opened a new chat a while ago
Yeah people don’t consider this aspect of having a massive talent / context window, especially in projects that last a looooong time. I’ve tried asking Claude to make my reminders and tweaks a durable log that survives compaction, which of course takes even more of the context after compaction but does seem to boost accuracy. The “drift” from already given instructions still exists though.
Quo est non ipsam et doloribus ratione blanditiis minima. Animi eos voluptatem neque in vero voluptate sit. Assumenda earum in et facere animi modi repellat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Illum aut dolorem provident non aut ab. Non voluptatibus nobis vero fugiat.
Unde qui iure ea libero. Reprehenderit dicta dignissimos accusantium ut.
Consequatur enim eum pariatur repudiandae dolores. Maxime quis voluptatem facere quis. Aperiam enim accusamus et excepturi quis ea eaque autem.
Autem quia velit qui dolore cumque unde culpa. Illum quos quae ut illo fuga incidunt id. Assumenda porro recusandae quis doloribus et consequatur. Soluta distinctio voluptas unde molestias esse consectetur. Dolorum aut nisi sit hic. Voluptas beatae molestias quis sint eum ea.