been trying to use Claude more for diligence, memo work, some light excel / model work, like auditing formulas etc but want to see how everyone else is using it?
has Fable 5 been a game changer in anyway and can you share any ideas how i can improve my own AI game?
| +72 | Does anyone believe their firm has a true competitive edge | 36 | 23h |
| +42 | Lateraling at senior associate / VP level | 11 | 2d |
| +27 | Do you regret doing PE? | 20 | 1h |
| +26 | Ares buying LGP...now what? | 8 | 6h |
| +25 | Imposter Syndrome: PE to Publics | 4 | 1d |
| +19 | Do PE VPs Always Have An Associate Under Them? | 12 | 3h |
| +15 | Francisco Partners Fundraise | 6 | 23h |
| +14 | Setting the right LBO entry multiple without information | 3 | 3d |
| +13 | GTCR vs BDT MSD vs MDP | 11 | 3h |
| MBA to EM Infra Investing? | 3 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Fable 5 is very good, has saved me a ton of time in diligence, doc review, portco monitoring.
What are your prompts ?
I don’t use prompts much anymore, for a lot of the tasks, I’ve basically compiled instructions and told Fable to make a skill. I have a skill called market structure and it goes through a checklist of questions or one for pricing power. It gives me a detailed output that i can read. Then i upload all the markdown files and use another skill called initial email template which formats the information from various skills into my normal first email template. Setting this up took a weekend the first time and then it’s been refined over time.
For data cuts / charts, i have a standard dashboard skill. I refined that skill using another skill that was made from a textbook on graphical presentations + our internal formatting preferences.
can i buy these off you please
No. Enjoy the underclass.
These are relatively simple to build if you spend an hour asking Claude to walk you through it
My answer isn’t related to the Anthropic’s Fable 5 itself but I find it interesting how much federal oversight is in these massive AI corporations for example I recommend researching EO 14409
Incredible. I'm a founder and use it to code, and it understands long-term thinking way better than Opus while also picking up on things I would've had to specify a few months ago. ALthough this is after ~6 months of creating a dev process and automating everything together so I just tell it what I want and it implements the features (full issue -> PR for any devs out there). Pretty cool stuff.
As a PE professional, you don't really need Fable and for pure workflow optimization, you really only need Sonnet Max. Using Opus to make dashboards and data cuts is kind of silly. But hey, it's not my usage.
Care to elaborate on your workflow optimization?
For software and creative work, it's game changing.
@Ozymandia @IsItREPE getting destroyed everyday.
I don't know a single person who uses it.
As with everything about AI, you make a claim and expect people to swallow it whole
Why do you keep tagging me in this stupidity?
And AI isn’t creative. It’s all slop stolen from the intellectual property of actually creative people.
It's stolen work, repackaged into sloppy hallucinations.
This moron's only point is that it is revolutionizing software coding (which, it isn't). Which makes it about as "revolutionary" as the handheld calculator, and that's the best case scenario!
Usage limit is pretty tight. It’s great but given how tight usage is you’re better off running on Opus 4.8
What effort level do you use. this is only an issue for me on Ultramax
Do skills really repeatedly work for you guys? I feel like I need to constantly remind it of even simple instructions within a skill (stuff that id think would be as easy to remember as brevity/length of a memo section). Then I hear a few folks say they are automating a ton of stuff with skills but that just does not line up with what I see in practice. I end up having to remind it of instructions embedded within the skill every couple requests. User error on my part? People stretching the truth on their part?
Probably some user error in prompting, but also it depends on what you're working on. Some stuff is rules based, formulaic, and automation is definitely a time saver. Other things are more nuanced.
Make sure you’re refreshing your context window. If it gets to the point where you need to be reminding it of anything, you should’ve opened a new chat a while ago
Exercitationem dolorem aut aut non rerum. Architecto quod voluptatem corporis maxime velit sunt. Molestiae ut nemo autem repellendus omnis sint dolorem. Voluptas explicabo nam modi numquam reiciendis rerum doloremque voluptas. Placeat velit magni reiciendis. Voluptas maiores nisi est vitae totam itaque aperiam in. Quae qui praesentium molestiae quas dolores vel quasi est.
Quis deserunt fugit rerum nemo atque id recusandae. Similique laboriosam in atque eius enim facilis. Cupiditate est aperiam odio nam saepe nisi. Est libero quidem dolores sit. Enim in sapiente quos corporis velit adipisci.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Odit ut blanditiis qui magni. Repellendus necessitatibus illo voluptatem magnam. Impedit asperiores maxime assumenda at dignissimos aut.
Fugit ratione est ut omnis. Et voluptate deleniti consequatur voluptatibus. Libero asperiores voluptate minima error perspiciatis est. Deleniti dolorem temporibus velit quas aspernatur fugit repellat pariatur.
Iure voluptatem ipsam ipsam eos consequuntur ut. Culpa illum fugiat rerum magni. Eaque magnam ullam soluta repudiandae quod totam occaecati.
Non in aspernatur magnam quis. Consequatur eligendi quae ut dolor velit fuga. Et id corporis id aut. Esse molestiae provident asperiores corrupti aut at. Facilis reiciendis deserunt fuga quis perspiciatis ab et.