Have you seen associates get fired? I’ve seen it once in four years and we’re now considering doing it again. It’s an exceptional situation - low IQ person, low effort, lazy, somewhat dishonest, terrible analytics, few if any strengths.
What were the circumstances in which you did it?
| +32 | How to Model SaaS Projections for Interviews | 48 | 1h | |
| +23 | European Megafunds (based on PEI 2023) | 17 | 21h | |
| +19 | Partners Group Long Term | 6 | 14h | |
| +18 | Advent NYC Culture/WLB - 2024 update | 5 | 11h | |
| +18 | Partners Group Comp + Offices | 8 | 6d | |
| +17 | How is your life in PE? | 10 | 13h | |
| +17 | Moving from PE Fund accounting to top 3 rating agency | 5 | 1d | |
| +16 | MBB first year exploring PE options | 3 | 1d | |
| +16 | Is on-cycle more or less competitive than regular IB recruiting? | 5 | 5h | |
| +13 | NYC Consumer PE/Growth Funds with decent comp but amazing WLB? | 2 | 2h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
How did such a person get hired in the first place?
yeah interested how he was able to finesse, PE interview processes seem to weed this type of stuff out i feel like.
I believe there was cheating involved in the key case studies since they were all remote
Could you not just give him a new slightly more difficult case study (to account for the time he’s been at the firm), have someone proctor him and see how he performs? If he flunks under proctoring I’d think you’d have a good data point .
Diversity
Straight white males who come in via nepotism sometimes perform bad also.
A secondaries fund in NYC fired an associate simply because they asked about the possibility of going hybrid lol. It's okay, he landed at another shop right away.
Wild. Care to share the name of said shop?
They focus on distressed investments
hope he found something better than secondaries too
Seems like the low effort, lazy, dishonest is what gets people fired on top of being low IQ and terrible analytics. Usually people who are bad at the job but are likeable, work hard, strive for improvement (e.g., good people that you wish well for but are just not good at the job) don't get fired but simply clip a paycheck and non-insulting bonus for two years and then go on their merry way somewhere else.
Two in my shop got cut 6 months in and got asked to leave… Shop was doing well, harsh.
Reason?
My UMM shop fires associates all the time, unfortunately.
How low iq are we talking? Some times I feel slower than some at work and I’m a 125-130
Completely have no basis for this but I feel like 130 is probably close to an average IQ in this industry
lol, most people in PE are not even close to 110..
Truly wouldn’t be surprised
Cause IQ is probably a scam.
https://medium.com/incerto/iq-is-largely-a-pseudoscientific-swindle-f13…
After I started I found out a couple associates got fired which is why they were hiring. Honestly probably would’ve thought twice about taking the offer if that was the case because most places will let you ride it out until you find a gig. Our strategy is turnaround / special sits and I think it just comes with the fact that people are more sharp elbowed here. Since joining I’ve seen us have serious discussions about firing third parties after like a week of hiring them for simple things like not feeling they are being responsive enough. Does make me feel like if they decide they aren’t going to give me a promotion that they will just fire me one day
Name of the shop so I can stay the hell away?
Such is the way of life. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
In MM PE Europe / London, seen it happen even when they were good but fund in question just culls every now and again
Have seen the same. Don’t spill coffee around the wrong the MD. After a certain number of firings one becomes numb to the outflow.
🤣
I fired an associate once. Pretty rare occurrence. Was too bad because he wasn’t lazy at all — just the opposite in fact, worked longer hours than any other associate by far.
I recommend that you do it alongside another senior colleague. If you are giving examples of how the person has performed poorly, which I think is appropriate, be prepared for them to offer rebuttals or ask for time to turn things around. The strategy that worked well for me was to deliver the news and if they aren’t prepared to have a dialogue after hearing it (due to shock or emotions or whatever), offer to have a follow-up conversation a few hours later with more detail once they’ve processed the news.
From the other perspective, now that I’m doing career mentorship I’ve worked with a few people who have been fired from PE roles at various levels of seniority. Sometimes the termination is a big surprise (one person thought they were getting called into a meeting to get promoted) and other times it is 100% expected. If you’re terminating someone, you cannot assume that they know they are underperforming … so be cautious.
And for those who have gotten terminated, in nearly every situation I’m aware of, the terminated employee has landed another PE role or in some cases an even better PE role. It isn’t the end of the world to lose your job — so don’t let it destroy your self esteem. I’ve seen a few very talented post-MBA PE professionals start to question whether PE is the right path for them after getting fired. Usually their termination is the result of misalignment with their employer’s culture versus any lack of talent on their part.
Good comment. In my previous post, the associates who got culled in the latest series also got 'better' roles (or at least equivalent - depending on your view), but as you say - it is not the end of the world
It would be morally wrong if this person landed a better role. When I said this is the worst associate I’ve ever worked with, that’s by some distance
Curious for your situation CompBanker and for others that have done the firing or seen this happen, how often does the employee that is getting fired get a chance to redeem themselves through the initial conversation that you have with them that tell him/her she is getting fired? If they offer valid rebuttals and/or passionately asks for a second chance or some time to redeem themselves, would you or the firm be actually willing to give it to him/her, or the decision has been 100% firmly made and there's no chance for him/her at the end no matter what happens?
I’ve never seen nor heard of anyone being given a “second chance” .. ever. Once the decision is made, it is made. This is for the USA.
Note that Europe is different because once you pass the probation period, you then have notice periods and often need to put someone on a performance improvement plan before officially firing them. However, in most situations, once you’re on a performance improvement plan, the decision has essentially been made except in rare circumstances.
what was the rationale for that firing if not for lack of motivation - i.e. too many mistakes, one major mess up, etc.?
How many associates do y’all have? Even 1 seems out of the norm for a MM fund (not UMM, of course)
Quidem repellat praesentium recusandae perferendis. Animi cupiditate nihil delectus. Laudantium ut rerum quis est facere deserunt.
Labore sunt officia voluptates. Laboriosam culpa aut odit. Iusto consequuntur voluptates architecto exercitationem esse. Facere neque veniam quidem sunt quod repellendus consectetur expedita.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Non architecto omnis nisi blanditiis repudiandae. Ipsum odit maiores non maxime ut temporibus non. Corrupti quibusdam dolores nihil molestiae. Quae quia illum expedita a perspiciatis. Quisquam enim fuga nemo ut.
Numquam pariatur voluptate aut et dolor molestiae sequi in. Sint ut qui officiis nostrum commodi nobis. Illum ut aut animi velit ut. Qui qui nihil ut mollitia tempore. Nobis sed earum laborum quia sit veniam voluptatum cupiditate. Sed sit nam molestiae nam esse praesentium dolor dolor.
Architecto corporis aut illo sit ut officia. Necessitatibus voluptatem explicabo quisquam eum iste quis tempora repudiandae. Expedita quisquam exercitationem beatae dolor ea et similique et. Omnis consequatur voluptatum sint possimus.
Similique inventore consectetur rerum libero repudiandae. Soluta est nemo qui earum. Beatae nihil qui laboriosam officia quod distinctio voluptatem. Cum ut asperiores repellendus beatae omnis itaque ducimus. Est corrupti autem in omnis repellat in. Veritatis ut repudiandae ut non reprehenderit. Voluptates sit alias asperiores recusandae vel veniam.