First Time Funds - How to Consider Role?

Considering a role as the first VP level hire at a first time fund. Current team is 2 partners, an operating partner (who I believe is currently part time) and an associate. No deals signed up yet and believe they’re funding ops through a small seed investment from a family office. Founders are relatively young so hard to point to a really long/impressive track record so kind of just taking a flyer on their network. 

Anyone have any experience starting at a firm like this? Having trouble reconciling the role as seems like great upside potential but no guarantee they’ll raise capital or get traction. Plus have no idea what to think on comp—haven’t gotten any indications yet but would think big decrease from UMM. Anyone have any thoughts or advice?

3 Comments
 

Taking a VP role at a first-time fund can be a high-risk, high-reward move. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key considerations:

  1. Upside Potential vs. Risk:

    • First-time funds often come with significant upside if the fund gains traction, raises capital, and executes successful deals. However, the lack of a proven track record and no deals signed yet are red flags. The reliance on a small seed investment from a family office adds to the uncertainty.
  2. Team Dynamics:

    • With a small team (2 partners, a part-time operating partner, and an associate), you may have a lot of responsibility and influence. This can be a great opportunity to shape the fund's strategy and operations, but it also means you’ll need to wear multiple hats and deal with the challenges of a lean setup.
  3. Compensation:

    • Expect a significant pay cut compared to UMM or MF roles. Compensation at first-time funds is often lower, with a larger portion tied to carry. However, carry at a first-time fund is speculative and depends on the fund’s ability to raise capital and generate returns. Be cautious and ensure you understand the terms of any carry offered.
  4. Fundraising and Traction:

    • The biggest risk is whether the fund can raise sufficient capital and gain traction. Without a strong track record or a clear pipeline of deals, this is a gamble. It’s worth discussing the founders’ fundraising strategy, their network, and their timeline for securing commitments.
  5. Due Diligence:

    • Speak with the founders to understand their vision, strategy, and plans for the fund. Ask about their fundraising progress, target LPs, and deal pipeline. Additionally, try to gauge their reputation and network within the industry.
  6. Exit Options:

    • Consider how this role might position you for future opportunities. If the fund doesn’t succeed, will the experience still be valuable for your career? Joining a first-time fund can demonstrate entrepreneurial spirit and versatility, but it’s important to weigh this against the potential downsides.
  7. Cultural Fit:

    • With a small team, cultural fit is critical. Ensure you align with the founders’ values and working style, as you’ll be working closely with them.

In summary, this role could be a unique opportunity to gain significant responsibility and upside, but it comes with substantial risks. Carefully evaluate the fund’s prospects, the founders’ credibility, and the compensation structure before making a decision.

Sources: Q&A: I’ve held Pre-MBA MM LBO, Growth Equity and Venture Capital investment roles for funds with $500M+ AUM to $5B+ AUM, Vice President Fund Carry/Equity, Joining Start Up Hedge Fund - What to Expect, Q&A: UMM PE VP, Q&A: UMM PE VP

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

On the surface looks like huge downside risk. No fund raised + young founders without a track record is unlikely to succeed and I would definitely not step from an established UMM to join something like this

 

Totam aliquid sequi et laboriosam laborum aut illo. Nemo unde non et harum omnis. Ex porro eligendi voluptatem incidunt eum temporibus fuga. Sunt a fugiat facere autem impedit.

Possimus dolorem suscipit non dolorem saepe. Nostrum voluptatem occaecati totam totam cum sint. A veniam dolore et sit sint eveniet quia. Recusandae eum aut quas quos hic repellendus sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”