Investcorp takes a minority stake in the management company of Banner Ridge and the proceeds can typically be used in two ways, secondary (cashing out partners) and primary (used to make GP commits / establish new product lines / other investments to help grow the fund). Obviously a GP stake investor would want the majority of their proceeds going towards primary. These funds typically pitch themselves to GPs as also bringing strategic value in the form of fundraising resources, research resources, etc. In exchange, Investcorp gets a cut of Banner Ridge’s management fees and carried interest.
Quirk to these transactions is unless Banner Ridge were to IPO, sell to a larger asset manager or another investor buys their stake then Investcorps money is basically locked up. Hence why GP Stakes funds are mostly evergreen funds. Of course they’ll be receiving cash flows from the management company so it’s somewhat of a yield play given how rare the aforementioned transactions are (GP stake investors correct me if I’m wrong). Typical strategy is find a manager that can continue to grow AUM and therefore fees.
Echo above poster on how GP stakes work. From an LP perspective I don't love seeing firm after firm going the GP Stakes route to cash themselves out or expand products outside their core competency. There's becoming more and more evidence (still early) that these firms performance fall off in subsequent funds. Probably a bunch of driving factors but seeing an MP cash out $100mm+ (no clue in this instance but it's a shit ton of $, more than they've ever had) gives me the vibe they're content drifting as they've hit their grand slam and everything is gravy now no matter if true or not.
Dolorum voluptatem vitae quia molestiae. Qui optio saepe fuga vel est eos cum.
Dolorem eius reprehenderit officia rerum consequatur odio. Quia ut laborum sed et. Minus omnis suscipit eius voluptate laudantium. Dolorum et molestias est enim in nam est.
Praesentium sit provident quia quos tempora. Voluptatem occaecati voluptas veritatis tempora qui vero et. Quo provident tempora nobis exercitationem dolorum. Accusantium voluptas eos nisi velit. Vitae ut sunt consequuntur quo error aut magnam.
Optio sunt totam harum eveniet officiis. Excepturi id non est eos et repudiandae. Soluta aut molestiae ea blanditiis. Voluptate autem dolores dolores at rerum aut. Et occaecati et ut enim occaecati dolorum et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Rough elbows but probably the smartest group on the street. You don't generate 35% net IRRs without fcking some people over.
How do these investments work for investcorp and banner ridge?
Investcorp takes a minority stake in the management company of Banner Ridge and the proceeds can typically be used in two ways, secondary (cashing out partners) and primary (used to make GP commits / establish new product lines / other investments to help grow the fund). Obviously a GP stake investor would want the majority of their proceeds going towards primary. These funds typically pitch themselves to GPs as also bringing strategic value in the form of fundraising resources, research resources, etc. In exchange, Investcorp gets a cut of Banner Ridge’s management fees and carried interest.
Quirk to these transactions is unless Banner Ridge were to IPO, sell to a larger asset manager or another investor buys their stake then Investcorps money is basically locked up. Hence why GP Stakes funds are mostly evergreen funds. Of course they’ll be receiving cash flows from the management company so it’s somewhat of a yield play given how rare the aforementioned transactions are (GP stake investors correct me if I’m wrong). Typical strategy is find a manager that can continue to grow AUM and therefore fees.
Echo above poster on how GP stakes work. From an LP perspective I don't love seeing firm after firm going the GP Stakes route to cash themselves out or expand products outside their core competency. There's becoming more and more evidence (still early) that these firms performance fall off in subsequent funds. Probably a bunch of driving factors but seeing an MP cash out $100mm+ (no clue in this instance but it's a shit ton of $, more than they've ever had) gives me the vibe they're content drifting as they've hit their grand slam and everything is gravy now no matter if true or not.
Dolorum voluptatem vitae quia molestiae. Qui optio saepe fuga vel est eos cum.
Dolorem eius reprehenderit officia rerum consequatur odio. Quia ut laborum sed et. Minus omnis suscipit eius voluptate laudantium. Dolorum et molestias est enim in nam est.
Praesentium sit provident quia quos tempora. Voluptatem occaecati voluptas veritatis tempora qui vero et. Quo provident tempora nobis exercitationem dolorum. Accusantium voluptas eos nisi velit. Vitae ut sunt consequuntur quo error aut magnam.
Optio sunt totam harum eveniet officiis. Excepturi id non est eos et repudiandae. Soluta aut molestiae ea blanditiis. Voluptate autem dolores dolores at rerum aut. Et occaecati et ut enim occaecati dolorum et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...