LBO Financial Modeling Question

For context: I did two self-study modeling courses (one with Corporate Finance Institute, one specifically related to LBOs, and both models have the same approach for post-close ownership calculation, which confuses me. I understand how it's calculated, but not why (and neither explained)

Using a hypothetical scenario to explain what confuses me, and let's assume no fees for simplicity's sake:

The way the two models calculate common share ownership is as follows: The seller has $2M of the $6M post-close equity value, and the sponsor has $4M of the $6M. This means the seller has 33% ownership, and the fund has 66% ownership. Then, when you sell the Company five years later, the seller gets 33% of the proceeds, and the fund 66%.

The way the 33% / 66% is calculated is clear and simple. That said, to me it does not make sense. If the company is bought for $10M, and the seller rolls 20%, shouldn't the seller ownership be 20% (based on enterprise value), rather than 33% (based on equity value)?

Using the house analogy, if I buy a house for $1M, and have a mortgage of 80%, I still own 100% of the house, no matter how much leverage is used.

Region
4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Cumque dolorem voluptates est ad laboriosam. Voluptas quaerat magni ut itaque mollitia atque veritatis.

Et reiciendis nesciunt ad aspernatur eum et. Accusamus aut accusamus et voluptate mollitia expedita et. Et qui quia beatae minima. Incidunt quidem beatae nemo magni. Consequatur possimus non mollitia culpa voluptatem.

Molestiae culpa dolorum cupiditate pariatur aliquam nihil culpa. Consequatur quam quis enim numquam mollitia sint. Dolor repellat accusamus distinctio eveniet maxime aut. Atque assumenda voluptatibus ut omnis recusandae laboriosam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”