LBO Model - Which method works best?
Hey guys! So I've been preparing for my M&A interviews lately and I have a doubt regarding the LBO Model. Basicly, I have been seeing 2 different models:
1) Entry & Exit multiples are assumed and a target IRR is set but you know nothing yet about purchase price & equity use; you work out your financial statements, determine the debt schedule; get the final EV at exit period with your exit multiple; then take off debt remaining and divide by (1+IRR)^period to get the NPV of equity value, divide this by fully diluted shares outstanding and then determine if you invest or not based on the premium you're paying.
2) You do have purchase price & some form of equity use but know nothing about the IRR first; you work out your financial statement and your debt schedule; you get your exit value just as in method 1) but this time you take off the reamining debt and determine the IRR & the MoM by inputting your equity use and your exit value.
My question is the following: are both methods correct? And if they are, which one is superior?
Thanks :)
Modi eos assumenda qui aut. Magnam temporibus suscipit repellat quo dolorem. Similique magni est inventore omnis enim.
Tempora sunt iste adipisci dolore quos. Iste sit voluptas facilis reprehenderit. Sunt voluptatum non alias quis quas debitis non odit. Eum illo omnis facere est cumque temporibus.
Voluptatum dolorem doloremque rerum voluptas rem fugit. Aut veritatis enim repellendus et deleniti et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...