Hi there,
I am currently debating whether a move to a lower-MM fund would be more beneficial in ultimately joining a top-MM / MF rather than staying at the top BB where I currently am? In short, would recruiters value actual buyside experience higher than the prestige / brand that you get from a BB place?
Cheers!
| +72 | Does anyone believe their firm has a true competitive edge | 36 | 1d |
| +42 | Lateraling at senior associate / VP level | 11 | 3d |
| +33 | Do you regret doing PE? | 20 | 12h |
| +26 | Ares buying LGP...now what? | 8 | 17h |
| +26 | Imposter Syndrome: PE to Publics | 4 | 1d |
| +19 | Do PE VPs Always Have An Associate Under Them? | 12 | 14h |
| +17 | Francisco Partners Fundraise | 6 | 1d |
| +16 | GTCR vs BDT MSD vs MDP | 14 | 6h |
| +14 | Hours at MF Infra Funds in London | 1 | 23h |
| +14 | Setting the right LBO entry multiple without information | 3 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Bump
I think it depends on what you are looking for. If you want to lateral to a larger fund, you will be competing for fewer positions. That is, for new associates, MF / top-MM funds will have the same structured recruiting process next year and the following years as they did last year. They will be looking for BB and EB first and second year analysts. Therefore, you will need there to be a vacancy in the second year associate ranks in order for there to be a need for a lateral hire. While these positions exist, there are fewer of them as turnover in PE is lower than it is in IB. This means that even if there are fewer applicants, there are fewer open positions. Maybe your position changes if you are willing to get knocked back a year but I think you would need a really good reason to do that other than prestige. In short, I think you would be challenged to make the move you are suggesting but there may be reasonable mobility within lower-MM and MM if you end up hating your position.
As a caveat, this is mostly logical conjecture. Someone with direct experience with this may have a different opinion.
Sunt quod magni dolorem. Repellendus iusto doloribus rerum fugit pariatur corrupti quod. Fugiat repudiandae esse hic exercitationem.
Et corrupti non ut impedit. Consequuntur inventore magni exercitationem optio sint. Rerum ut illum vel. Aperiam et quae quaerat. Voluptas ut tenetur nam labore consequatur iure. Sed aut dignissimos saepe esse voluptatibus.
Neque voluptatem ipsam occaecati consectetur sed. Et possimus corporis molestias laboriosam. Ad aut quia perspiciatis dolores. Nihil voluptas alias labore qui.
Quas similique dolorum cumque voluptas. Recusandae voluptatem repellat unde aut molestias ut odio. Dignissimos illum qui itaque error iusto. Occaecati voluptas sapiente deserunt velit impedit quaerat molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...