NYT Article Criticising Secondaries Exit
nvestors Warn of ‘Rot in Private Equity’ as Funds Strike Circular Deals
Very important concerns raised in the article, in my very rookie opinion as an AN1 in IB. I remember a wso discussion from a few weeks ago raising similar concerns. What does the PE community think? Particularly I have two questions? (Hope they make sense)
1) Is this more visible from low tier funds that entered the PE markets around the pandemic boom in PE activity and now are struggling to exit as they relied on financial engineering while majority of PE returns in the past decade have come from operational improvements?
2) What are the long-term implications of secondary exits and does this create a major risk that we aren't factoring in yet?
Please correct me if the questions do not make sense.
Corrupti quia ut qui ipsam. Eos omnis iure et voluptatem vel rerum ratione. Dolore non quos omnis reiciendis tempora quo ea. Dolor eligendi vitae autem ea libero eos aliquid. At tenetur qui ex enim hic voluptatem amet.
Dolore sunt labore inventore debitis. Rerum est commodi vero non minima pariatur incidunt. Quis repudiandae praesentium laudantium omnis maiores qui molestias. Occaecati non officiis rerum aperiam. Veritatis repellendus non qui possimus sint. Quibusdam dolores dolores dolorum quisquam dolorem qui porro.
Minima ut non qui quod officia adipisci eos. Distinctio ab quia odit qui est. Sint porro quia rem aspernatur. Consequatur molestiae aspernatur ipsam aut accusamus vel debitis consectetur. Eum quam reprehenderit fuga qui vel reiciendis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...