Off Cycle Recruiting Stories
With the quote, "If you build it, they will come" in mind, does anybody have any success stories related to holding off with on-cycle recruiting, dunking on your first 2 years as an analyst, and then having PE firms knocking on your door? Or, is that a fool's plan and the most successful recruit ASAP.
As some background on myself, I am currently finishing up my two years in IB (coverage) at a BB (NYC) and will be transitioning this summer to working at a MM buyout fund in NYC.
I purposely held off on on-cycle recruiting right out the gate back as it starts a couple of months after you hit the desk after college. While I understand that on-cycle recruiting is the sure-fire and sometimes only way of getting into MF roles, at the end of the day it is a little absurd to recruit for a role after just starting at your present role as well as intellectual dishonest to look the recruiter or whoever is interviewing you in the eye and tell them that you know what you are talking about with respect to your "time in finance" as at that point you have limited to no tangible deal experience.
What I did instead was to focus on getting quality deal experience my first year so that I could have something to speak to during my interviews as well as on meeting all the PE head hunters, while telling them all that I only intended to recruit after completing one year on the job.
After the year passed, I followed up with the recruiters who I connected with with a well padded CV, networked with associates across the street, received interviews from about 10-15 places, and subsequently, received an offer from my top choice shop.
I would personally recommend not waiting two years to recruit, but rather build a solid foundation of work that you can speak to in one year and then use your remaining analyst year to fully commit to recruiting.
Off-cycle recruiting, particularly later in your analyst term is slightly more difficult (although I don't know as I didn't do on-cycle) because you are expected to know your stuff. You are expected to know your technicals and complete your model tests with no issues, you are expected to have deal experience and be able to speak to your deals inside and out. However, if anything, later term recruiting is less of a crapshoot in that way in that it allows you to come in fully prepared.
There are downsides however, if you don't prepare adequately and or just cruise through your first year in IB, that hurts you on the back end as you are expected to have experience out the gate. Furthermore, as just happened with recruitment collapsing in March / April, you can be caught on the wrong side of the cycle and out of the job versus your friends who might have recruited earlier / on-cycle.
Ultimately, any career move is a game of pros and cons. I personally would recommend to do off-cycle recruiting as it allows you to 1) maximize your preparedness, 2) network a ton across the street and 3) identify the opportunities you actually want to work (think lifestyle / culture, industry, fund strategy) rather than simply joining the rat race of on-cycle recruiting and that is the strategy that worked for me.
However, I have also heard plenty of success stories of people receiving fantastic on-cycle / early off-cycle offers, and if it works it works!
Happy to discuss further.