PE Recruiting - London
When we discuss which groups/banks are best for exits, is this because these coverage/product groups have a strong reputation with headhunters? Or is it because that group will see you getting strong dealflow/opportunities to model etc?
I am aware that a second language is very important, but am interested in some perspective on what it is that recruiters actually look for in an analyst. For example if you are at a weaker group in a lower tier BB/EB, but by chance have strong transaction and modelling experience, will you get many opportunities? Or is it as simple as, if your bank/group does not have a strong reputation on the street/with headhunters, your opportunities are limited?
Bump
Cum quasi quia eos reiciendis dolorum voluptatem perspiciatis. Ad distinctio omnis quam ut ut ipsam. Est enim cumque mollitia et repellendus quibusdam dolorem. Natus assumenda deserunt provident exercitationem vel et rerum dolore. Dolorum nulla numquam ratione at.
Voluptatem nesciunt nesciunt minima nihil pariatur. Ut soluta et in molestias. Ratione et quia distinctio et nihil eos blanditiis sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...