PE vs credit investors - how do the priorities in thought process differ?

Hi everyone:

I’ve been thinking about this question, and would love to get your perspective - how do the priorities in private equity versus credit investment processes differ? I’d love to know what each side think the other side might be missing, and how to form an integrated view!

Here’s what I came up with:

PE - key priorities in investment thought process: Margin, growth, exit

Credit - key priorities in investment thought process: Stability of cash flow, term/structure

Would love to hear your views!

4 Comments
 

Can't talk about the PE side, but currently a distressed / deep value investor.

I would say that the investing approaches are somewhat similar to an extent, although depends on the PE firm and their investing style (some target growth while others are value driven). We look for business with low capex needs, stability in cash flows, and cheap valuation.

We try to find situations where there is a temporary dislocation in the market price of the debt due to some circumstance, either forced selling, temporary accounting issues, heavy temporary investment spending, etc. We stay away from turnaround situations as they are too risky.

I would say one thing that is different versus PE is that distressed investors focus a ton on the legal side of things. We focus on credit agreements/indentures heavily and figure out how we can get screwed by management/sponsor or in a bankruptcy process. A lot of game theory involved.

 
Most Helpful

Private equity funds will focus on both potential upside as well as downside, whereas private credit funds will primarily focus on just the downside. Basically it reflects the risk/reward profile of the 2 asset classes - PE will care about upside as their returns are primarily driven by equity value, whereas the returns on private credit will be capped at their margin/coupon so they care less about upside and are more concerned about how things can go wrong. That's not to say PE don't care about downside - they definitely do given they have the most to lose if things go south(they are at the bottom of the recovery waterfall). On top of my head, I'd say some key area topics in terms of potential upside vs downside diligence are:

Potential Upside diligence: - Outlook for add-on acq. opportunities -- this is key because it's usually quicker to scale up businesses via acquisitions than via organic growth. You'll see a lot of sponsors do this strategy of "acquire Company XYZ as an acquisition platform, do a bunch of add-ons, sell for similar exit multiple, then profit" - Potential procurement to supplier contracts, esp as the business grows in scale - Potential buyer landscape, esp strategics (in light of exit in year 5-7) - Various potential cost cutting measures - ProperManagement team to drive sponsor business plan

Potential downside diligence: - Revenue visibility - Customer stickiness - Net Working Capital needs - Capex (Maintenance vs Growth) - Cash Flow generation - Fixed cost vs. variable cost - Op leases vs. capital leases - Cyclicality of industry - Competitive positioning - Addressable market - Barriers to entry - Covenants - Historical Performance - LTV

I could list a ton more, but a lot of it becomes sector specific so I'll just leave it at the above. Full disclosure - I'm a credit guy so I'm more familiar on the credit analysis side of things but I'm sure other PE guys on this board can chip in on what addt'l aspects they focus on as an equity investor

Hope this helps

Array
 

Ea amet sint omnis vel quis iusto ut. Quo sed assumenda ipsam laborum. Corrupti quasi voluptate labore qui ut dolorem. Autem sit eos et qui quas eum autem. Enim est et rem delectus.

Cum rerum eius dolore. Officia libero ut sit aut illum. Omnis et dolorem vitae rem vitae delectus.

Impedit odio dolor error corrupti modi sit. Sed corporis quis ipsa et et repellat. Temporibus alias odit sed magni. Aliquam sint ut dolore adipisci eum illo maxime.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (352) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”